Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1810663

Summary: [IPI Baremetal] Hostname requirements are too restrictive
Product: OpenShift Container Platform Reporter: Ben Nemec <bnemec>
Component: Machine Config OperatorAssignee: Ben Nemec <bnemec>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Victor Voronkov <vvoronko>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4.4CC: amurdaca, kgarriso, mnguyen, smilner, vvoronko, wsun
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 4.4.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Feature: Arbitrary hostnames for master nodes. Reason: Deployers will often have preferred naming formats for their hosts and will not want to use master-0, master-1, etc. Result: Master nodes can be named with any valid hostname.
 Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1804944 Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-05-04 11:44:56 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1804944    
Bug Blocks:    

Comment 4 Victor Voronkov 2020-04-20 18:46:06 UTC 
Verified on 4.4.0-0.nightly-2020-04-16-153108

[core@master-0-0 ~]$ host -t SRV _etcd-server-ssl._tcp.ocp-edge-cluster-0.qe.lab.redhat.com
_etcd-server-ssl._tcp.ocp-edge-cluster-0.qe.lab.redhat.com has SRV record 0 10 2380 master-0-0.ocp-edge-cluster-0.qe.lab.redhat.com.
_etcd-server-ssl._tcp.ocp-edge-cluster-0.qe.lab.redhat.com has SRV record 0 10 2380 master-0-1.ocp-edge-cluster-0.qe.lab.redhat.com.
_etcd-server-ssl._tcp.ocp-edge-cluster-0.qe.lab.redhat.com has SRV record 0 10 2380 master-0-2.ocp-edge-cluster-0.qe.lab.redhat.com.
Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2020-05-04 11:44:56 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:0581