Bug 1812328
| Summary: | Cluster Autoscaling in AWS creating multiple EC2 instances. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Vedanti Jaypurkar <vjaypurk> |
| Component: | Cloud Compute | Assignee: | Joel Speed <jspeed> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Jianwei Hou <jhou> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 4.2.0 | CC: | aos-bugs, cshulman, eparis, jokerman, mfojtik, mpatel, nagrawal, zyu |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | 4.5.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2020-04-03 11:16:55 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Vedanti Jaypurkar
2020-03-11 02:10:20 UTC
I've had a look at this and compared the logs to the code to try and work out which specific version of the code they might be on. Based on the log lines they must be using a one of these three commits https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-aws/commit/3661b213fae0f9e9b1c887df94d0a4e3981c4d6c, https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-aws/commit/e91ddd88ef516c62f6de2b5ee0c27d74fa2714eb or https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-aws/commit/5d8d336d2f415faba1553afd6d9763f9113b56e8 Importantly this means that the version that caused this bug does not include https://github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-aws/commit/16d9c184cf29f0f5e48abcf529865b61cb71e811 which fixed a bug with similar description (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796595 `Exists` also wasn't detecting the machine had already created an instance). Since this is already fixed and backported to 4.2, I'd encourage the customer to update to a later version in the 4.2 stream (I believe this should be in 4.2.20+) I believe this issue to be a direct duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1796595 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1796595 *** |