Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1812360

Summary: Rhel 7.8 ledctl command reports an error
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: 张茂岭 <zhangmaoling>
Component: ledmonAssignee: Jan Synacek <jsynacek>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Storage QE <storage-qe>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 7.8CC: jsynacek, xujin
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-03-19 06:09:26 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
sosreport none

Description 张茂岭 2020-03-11 07:07:34 UTC
Created attachment 1669162 [details]
sosreport

Description of problem:
"Ledctl locate=/dev/sdc" command execution error, cannot be used.The ledmon package is ledmon-0.92-1.el7.x86_64.rpm.When a lower version of Ledmon package ledmon-0.80-2.el7.x86_64.rpm is installed, the ledctl command can be used normally.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ledmon-0.92-1.el7.x86_64.rpm

How reproducible:
On the rhel7.8 operating system, an error occurs when you execute the ledctl locate=/dev/sdc command.

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Install the rhel7.8 operating system ;
2.Execute the “edctl locate=/dev/sdc”command.
3.

Actual results:
The execution command is prompted as follows:
[root@localhost ~]# ledctl locate /dev/sdc
/dev/shm/ledmon.conf: does not exist, using global config file
/etc/ledmon.conf: does not exist, using built-in default

Expected results:
There is no error message for executing the command as follows:
[root@localhost ~]# ledctl locate=/dev/sdc
[root@localhost ~]# 

Additional info:

Comment 2 xujin 2020-03-11 09:31:21 UTC
Hi Jan, 

Please have a look at this issue, and kindly share if it is possible to fix this issue on RHEL 7.8. 

Thanks. 


Best Regards
Edward

Comment 3 xujin 2020-03-16 07:55:14 UTC
Hi Jan, 

Hope you are doing good. 

Do you have any update on it? 

Thank you. 


Best Regards
Edward

Comment 4 Jan Synacek 2020-03-16 08:08:34 UTC
(In reply to 张茂岭 from comment #0)
> Actual results:
> The execution command is prompted as follows:
> [root@localhost ~]# ledctl locate /dev/sdc
> /dev/shm/ledmon.conf: does not exist, using global config file
> /etc/ledmon.conf: does not exist, using built-in default

I don't see any errors. The program simply states that it's using a default configuration. Since you didn't provide the exit code, I assume the command ran without any issues.

Comment 5 张茂岭 2020-03-19 02:05:57 UTC
Ok, I see.I have tested that the exit code is 0,so the prompt message is normal.You can ignore this problem.thank you!