Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1812858 - Satellite Inventory Plugin does not appear to make reports which match yupana's API specification
Summary: Satellite Inventory Plugin does not appear to make reports which match yupana...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: RH Cloud - Inventory
Version: 6.7.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: 6.8.0
Assignee: Shimon Shtein
QA Contact: Mirek Długosz
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1817553 1862250 (view as bug list)
Depends On: 1821752 1821756 1826678 1826714
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-03-12 11:02 UTC by Rich Jerrido
Modified: 2024-03-25 15:44 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version: tfm-rubygem-foreman_rh_cloud-1.0.6
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1862250 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-10-27 13:00:31 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2020:4366 0 None None None 2020-10-27 13:00:48 UTC

Description Rich Jerrido 2020-03-12 11:02:29 UTC 
Description of problem:


While troubleshooting a user not seeing data in Subscription Watch, we noticed that the metadata.json does not appear to meet Yupana's specification. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
tfm-rubygem-foreman_inventory_upload-1.0.2-0.1.el7sat.noarch.rpm

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Download report using the Satellite plugin
2. inspect metadata.json and compare to the Yupana API spec
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 5 Shimon Shtein 2020-03-29 15:40:15 UTC 
*** Bug 1817553 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Sanket Jagtap 2020-04-16 14:08:49 UTC 
*** Bug 1823396 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Shimon Shtein 2020-04-16 14:58:49 UTC 
*** Bug 1823396 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Kevan Holdaway 2020-04-20 13:22:19 UTC 
Also, this writeup confuses different layers.  Ingress does not reject anything or validate anything.

Possible issues include:
1. Yupana rejects tar.gz format because you did not conform to syntax (see https://github.com/quipucords/yupana#-formatting-data-for-yupana-without-qpc).  However, this has nothing to do with subscription_status
2. HBI may reject a host (not the tar.gz) based on invalid syntax.  Yupana does NOT validate hosts.  HBI validates hosts.   So likely HBI didn't like subscription_status

I do not think these issues are the same.

- This bug relates to yupana validation
- Bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823396 relates to HBI validate

I do not think this is a duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1823396 based on the fact the validation failures are in different services.
Comment 12 James Jeffers 2020-08-03 14:55:18 UTC 
*** Bug 1862250 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 15 errata-xmlrpc 2020-10-27 13:00:31 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Important: Satellite 6.8 release), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:4366
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.