Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
Red Hat Satellite engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on Satellite to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs will be migrated starting at the end of May. If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "Satellite project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SAT-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Applicable errata not showing up or computed correctly module stream errata.
* Create a content view that has rhel8 appstream
* Publish the content view
* Have a rhel8 host consume off it
* On the host run the following
"""
$ dnf -y module install nodejs:10
$ dnf -y install nodejs
$ dnf -y downgrade nodejs
"""
Now back on the above CV
* Create an errata excludes filter and exclude RHSA-2020:0579
* Publish the content view
* Content -> Errata
* Search for 'errata_id = RHSA-2020:0579'
Expected:
RHSA-2020:0579 shows up as applicable since the applicability is calculated according to the library environment.
Actual:
RHSA-2020:0579 does not show up in the applicable errata list and lets you apply it on the host.
This needs to be worked on by katello, not pulp. It does not appear to be a regression, but likely is easier to reproduce now that we have proper filtering of errata within modules (i.e. a more artifical reproduction)
I'm proposing for 6.7.z since its not a regression.
Followed the steps above outline by Partha, but instead used RHSA-2020:2848 for filtering and searching, since RHSA-2020:0579 is outdated.
Expected result:
RHSA-2020:2848 shows up as applicable since the applicability is calculated according to the library environment.
Actual result:
RHSA-2020:2848 showed up as applicable since the applicability is calculated according to the library environment.
Verified on 6.8.0_010.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.
For information on the advisory (Important: Satellite 6.8 release), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.
If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:4366