Applicable errata not showing up or computed correctly module stream errata. * Create a content view that has rhel8 appstream * Publish the content view * Have a rhel8 host consume off it * On the host run the following """ $ dnf -y module install nodejs:10 $ dnf -y install nodejs $ dnf -y downgrade nodejs """ Now back on the above CV * Create an errata excludes filter and exclude RHSA-2020:0579 * Publish the content view * Content -> Errata * Search for 'errata_id = RHSA-2020:0579' Expected: RHSA-2020:0579 shows up as applicable since the applicability is calculated according to the library environment. Actual: RHSA-2020:0579 does not show up in the applicable errata list and lets you apply it on the host.
This needs to be worked on by katello, not pulp. It does not appear to be a regression, but likely is easier to reproduce now that we have proper filtering of errata within modules (i.e. a more artifical reproduction) I'm proposing for 6.7.z since its not a regression.
Connecting redmine issue https://projects.theforeman.org/issues/29488 from this bug
Upstream bug assigned to paji
Moving this bug to POST for triage into Satellite 6 since the upstream issue https://projects.theforeman.org/issues/29488 has been resolved.
Followed the steps above outline by Partha, but instead used RHSA-2020:2848 for filtering and searching, since RHSA-2020:0579 is outdated. Expected result: RHSA-2020:2848 shows up as applicable since the applicability is calculated according to the library environment. Actual result: RHSA-2020:2848 showed up as applicable since the applicability is calculated according to the library environment. Verified on 6.8.0_010.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Important: Satellite 6.8 release), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:4366