RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1814526 - [RFE] pcp-atop does not have process accounting feature
Summary: [RFE] pcp-atop does not have process accounting feature
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Classification: Red Hat
Component: pcp
Version: 8.4
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: 8.0
Assignee: Nathan Scott
QA Contact: Jan Kurik
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1854035
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-03-18 06:25 UTC by Yogesh Babar
Modified: 2021-09-17 12:44 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: pcp-5.2.2-1.el8
Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-05-18 15:19:30 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Yogesh Babar 2020-03-18 06:25:25 UTC
Description of problem:

The Atop does not show the process of accounting information since the feature is not implemented yet. As per my basic understanding the new PMDA has to be written to implement it.  

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

pcp-4.3.0-3.el8.x86_64

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Simply run the atop
2. 

Actual results:

Shows the 'no procacct' error message. 

Expected results:
It should show the process accounting information

Additional info:

If added it would be a great feature in solving RHEL performance issues.

Comment 1 Nathan Scott 2020-07-21 00:21:57 UTC
Quick update: pcp-5.2.0 is adding the acct.* metrics to pmdaproc needed to implement this feature in pcp-atop, thanks largely to an engineer working at Fujitsu (Shogo Matsumoto).  I believe he is also planning to work on pcp-atop next - but either way this RFE has gone a long way toward completion as a result of that recent work.

Comment 2 Yogesh Babar 2020-07-27 05:20:51 UTC
(In reply to Nathan Scott from comment #1)
> Quick update: pcp-5.2.0 is adding the acct.* metrics to pmdaproc needed to
> implement this feature in pcp-atop, thanks largely to an engineer working at
> Fujitsu (Shogo Matsumoto).  I believe he is also planning to work on
> pcp-atop next - but either way this RFE has gone a long way toward
> completion as a result of that recent work.

Thanks for the update Nathan. I cant wait to test it. Having accnt.* metrics will be a great addition. Shogo++

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2021-05-18 15:19:30 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (pcp bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:1754


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.