Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
For bugs related to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1 product line. For Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and above, please visit Red Hat JIRA https://issues.redhat.com/secure/CreateIssue!default.jspa?pid=12332745 to report new issues.

Bug 181665

Summary: CVE-2006-0709 Metamail heap based buffer overflow
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1 Reporter: Josh Bressers <bressers>
Component: metamailAssignee: Nalin Dahyabhai <nalin>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact:
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 2.1CC: mjc
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Security
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: source=debian,reported=20060213,public=20060212,impact=important
Fixed In Version: RHSA-2006-0217 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-02-21 14:32:59 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Reproducer that crashes on RHEL2.1 none

Description Josh Bressers 2006-02-15 19:25:05 UTC 
Metamail heap based buffer overflow

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=352482

A bug was found in the way metmail processes boundaries in mail
messages.  This issue is a pretty standard heap based buffer overflow.
The Debian bug has a reproducer and a patch.

This issue has been rated as Important since the elm mail reader uses
metamail to handle MIME messages.
Comment 2 Josh Bressers 2006-02-15 21:22:40 UTC 
Created attachment 124705 [details]
Reproducer that crashes on RHEL2.1
Comment 5 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-02-21 14:33:00 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0217.html