Bug 1817463 - Incorrect reconciliation of OpenShift Route based on K8s Ingress
Summary: Incorrect reconciliation of OpenShift Route based on K8s Ingress
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1763340
Alias: None
Product: OpenShift Container Platform
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Networking
Version: 3.11.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: 3.11.z
Assignee: Dan Mace
QA Contact: Hongan Li
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1760776
Blocks: 1763340
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-03-26 11:45 UTC by Dan Mace
Modified: 2022-08-04 22:27 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 1760776
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-03-26 16:52:24 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Dan Mace 2020-03-26 11:45:12 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1760776 +++

Description of problem:

Customers word from case description :

One of our developers created a ticket for openshift origin: 

https://github.com/openshift/origin/issues/23937 

Is there a solution from redhat available for his issue?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

OpenShift Master: v3.11.141
Kubernetes Master: v1.11.0+d4cacc0

How reproducible:

Always as suggested in above github link.

Steps to Reproduce:

Refer https://github.com/openshift/origin/issues/23937 

Actual results:

Refer https://github.com/openshift/origin/issues/23937 

Expected results:

Refer https://github.com/openshift/origin/issues/23937 

Additional info:

Will link the case to BZ for more information.

--- Additional comment from Gabriel Stein on 2019-10-17 07:50:39 UTC ---

Hi team,

My customer, Porsche Informatik GmbH is affected by this issue, they would like to have some plans on this fix.

Thanks in Advance!

All the best,

Gabriel

--- Additional comment from Dan Mace on 2019-11-01 00:02:47 UTC ---

Miciah, would you mind taking this one over? You've done a huge amount of work on it already.

--- Additional comment from Saurabh Sadhale on 2019-11-08 05:32:40 UTC ---

I was wondering if the Bugzilla has any progress.

--- Additional comment from amit anjarlekar on 2019-11-13 06:14:38 UTC ---

Can we get latest on the reported BZ please? We can communicate the customer accordingly.

Thanks

--- Additional comment from amit anjarlekar on 2020-01-15 06:09:26 UTC ---

Can we get latest on the reported BZ please? Seems its in POST state for quite a long time.

--- Additional comment from Dan Mace on 2020-01-17 17:52:35 UTC ---

https://github.com/openshift/openshift-controller-manager/pull/53 has been merged for a while now, looks like the bug fell out of sync with GitHub. I fixed it.

--- Additional comment from errata-xmlrpc on 2020-01-17 22:18:57 UTC ---

Bug report changed to ON_QA status by Errata System.
A QE request has been submitted for advisory RHBA-2019:47983-01
https://errata.devel.redhat.com/advisory/47983

--- Additional comment from Hongan Li on 2020-02-10 12:17:12 UTC ---

Verified with 4.4.0-0.nightly-2020-02-09-220310 and the issue has been fixed.

the route is created as below:
  spec:
    host: app.test.com
    path: /
    port:
      targetPort: http-default
    to:
      kind: Service
      name: app

--- Additional comment from Simon Krenger on 2020-02-26 08:56:28 UTC ---

As this bug was opened for OpenShift Container Platform 3.11, may we request a backport to 3.11 as well?

--- Additional comment from Simon Krenger on 2020-03-26 09:24:09 UTC ---

Requesting an update and a check if we backport this to 3.11 as well?

Comment 1 Miciah Dashiel Butler Masters 2020-03-26 16:52:24 UTC
We already have bug 1763340 for a 3.11 backport.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1763340 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.