Bug 181900 - It should be Bengali (bn) Language Pack, not Bengali-India (bn_IN) Language pack
Summary: It should be Bengali (bn) Language Pack, not Bengali-India (bn_IN) Language pack
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: openoffice.org
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Caolan McNamara
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-02-17 17:27 UTC by Jamil Ahmed
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-03-23 08:03:22 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jamil Ahmed 2006-02-17 17:27:32 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.1) Gecko/20060111 Firefox/1.5.0.1

Description of problem:
We [http://www.ankurbangla.org/ and [http://bn.openoffice.org/] work for Bengali language in OpenOffice.org which is not country specific [ie, bn_BD or bn_IN].

But the RPM package distributed contains bn_IN code - which is not correct. It should be, openoffice.org-langpack-bn-2.0.1.1-11.2.2.i386.rpm

Ref:
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/Fedora/RPMS/


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
openoffice.org-langpack-bn_IN-2.0.1.1-11.2.2.i386.rpm

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
rpm -qa | grep openoffice.org-langpack-bn

Actual Results:  openoffice.org-langpack-bn_IN-2.0.1.1-11.2.2.i386.rpm

Expected Results:  openoffice.org-langpack-bn-2.0.1.1-11.2.2.i386.rpm

Additional info:

Comment 1 Rahul Sundaram 2006-02-20 10:38:19 UTC

These bugs are being closed since a large number of updates have been released
after the FC5 test1 and test2 releases. Kindly update your system by running yum
update as root user or try out the third and final test version of FC5 being
released in a short while and verify if the bugs are still present on the system
.Reopen or file new bug reports as appropriate after confirming the presence of
this issue. Thanks

Comment 2 Jamil Ahmed 2006-02-20 11:58:08 UTC
This bug exist in the development branch too.

Comment 3 Caolan McNamara 2006-02-23 10:06:56 UTC
yeah, probably should. I'll do that post fc5 as the deed is done and it's a pain
in the ass to change it right now.

Comment 4 Caolan McNamara 2006-03-23 08:03:22 UTC
now fixed for fc6


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.