Bug 1821026 - Review Request: clojure-core-specs-alpha - library to describe Clojure core macros and functions
Summary: Review Request: clojure-core-specs-alpha - library to describe Clojure core m...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: chedi toueiti
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-04-05 13:25 UTC by Markku Korkeala
Modified: 2020-07-24 12:17 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-07-24 12:17:48 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
chedi.toueiti: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Markku Korkeala 2020-04-05 13:25:55 UTC
Spec URL: https://korkeala.fedorapeople.org/clojure-core-specs-alpha/clojure-core-specs-alpha.spec

SRPM URL: https://korkeala.fedorapeople.org/clojure-core-specs-alpha/clojure-core-specs-alpha-0.1.24-1.fc31.src.rpm

Description: Core.specs.alpha is a Clojure library containing specs to
describe Clojure core macros and functions.

Fedora Account System Username: korkeala

This requires clojure-spec-alpha as a dependency, review request ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821025)

Copr build against rawhide is availabe at:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/korkeala/clojure/build/1328143/

Comment 1 chedi toueiti 2020-04-06 09:06:30 UTC
Looks good to me

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- This seems like a Java package, please install fedora-review-plugin-java
  to get additional checks


===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
     Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "Eclipse Public License (v1.0)", "*No
     copyright* Eclipse Public License (v1.0)". 9 files have unknown
     license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /mnt/56298eef-80c6-43f5-8aee-172b1d73d266/Projects/Fedora/swaps/copr-
     build-1328143/review-clojure-core-specs-alpha/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[!]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[ ]: Latest version is packaged.
[ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[ ]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[ ]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[ ]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: clojure-core-specs-alpha-0.1.24-1.fc33.noarch.rpm
          clojure-core-specs-alpha-0.1.24-1.fc33.src.rpm
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
	LANGUAGE = (unset),
	LC_ALL = (unset),
	LC_CTYPE = "C.UTF-8",
	LANG = "en_US.UTF-8"
    are supported and installed on your system.
perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C").
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
	LANGUAGE = (unset),
	LC_ALL = (unset),
	LC_CTYPE = "C.UTF-8",
	LANG = "en_US.UTF-8"
    are supported and installed on your system.
perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C").
clojure-core-specs-alpha.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/clojure/core.specs.alpha <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known>
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/clojure/core.specs.alpha/archive/core.specs.alpha-0.1.24.zip :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : ece52f58634e987f0db8e3f5b10c8bfc7b6cd05abfac672944ac18afa5657fc1
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : ece52f58634e987f0db8e3f5b10c8bfc7b6cd05abfac672944ac18afa5657fc1


Requires
--------
clojure-core-specs-alpha (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    clojure
    java-headless
    javapackages-filesystem



Provides
--------
clojure-core-specs-alpha:
    clojure-core-specs-alpha
    mvn(org.clojure:core.specs.alpha)
    mvn(org.clojure:core.specs.alpha:pom:)



Generated by fedora-review 0.7.5 (5fa5b7e) last change: 2020-02-16
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review --copr-build 1328143
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, Java
Disabled plugins: C/C++, fonts, SugarActivity, Python, PHP, Perl, Ocaml, Haskell, R
Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH

Comment 2 Gwyn Ciesla 2020-04-06 13:15:44 UTC
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/clojure-core-specs-alpha


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.