Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

Bug 1821757

Summary:	OBC Data is showing Base64 encoded value
Product:	OpenShift Container Platform	Reporter:	Bipul Adhikari <badhikar>
Component:	Console Storage Plugin	Assignee:	Bipul Adhikari <badhikar>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Raz Tamir <ratamir>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	4.5	CC:	aos-bugs, ebondare, nthomas
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	4.5.0
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	No Doc Update
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Clones:	1822531 (view as bug list)		Environment:
Last Closed:	2020-07-13 17:26:04 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1822531

Description Bipul Adhikari 2020-04-07 14:19:03 UTC

Description of problem:
The OBC details page shows base64 encoded value.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.3 and above

How reproducible:
1/1

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create OBC and go to the details page
2. Open the secret related to OBC on a different page.
3. The value shown in OBC data(secret and access key) is encoded value of what is seen in the secret page.

Actual results:
The two values are different.


Expected results:
The two values should be equal(In secret and OBC data page).

Additional info:

Comment 3 Elena Bondarenko 2020-04-09 08:08:53 UTC

I tested with 4.5.0-0.nightly-2020-04-09-040908, OBC details page shows the same un-encoded values as the secret details page.

Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2020-07-13 17:26:04 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:2409