Bug 1821867 - release-openshift-ocp-installer-e2e-gcp-ovn-4.4: currently broken & need to be fixed and reenabled
Summary: release-openshift-ocp-installer-e2e-gcp-ovn-4.4: currently broken & need to b...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: OpenShift Container Platform
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Networking
Version: 4.4
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: 4.6.0
Assignee: Ben Bennett
QA Contact: zhaozhanqi
URL:
Whiteboard: SDN-CI-IMPACT
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-04-07 18:26 UTC by Kirsten Garrison
Modified: 2020-07-13 14:48 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-07-13 14:48:50 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Kirsten Garrison 2020-04-07 18:26:34 UTC
gcp-ovn job is consistently failing for a month:
https://prow.svc.ci.openshift.org/job-history/origin-ci-test/logs/release-openshift-ocp-installer-e2e-gcp-ovn-4.4

They have been removed from the release controller by: https://github.com/openshift/release/pull/8195

and marked broken :
https://github.com/openshift/release/pull/8197

This BZ is to be closed when the job is fixed and reenabled.

Comment 1 Ben Parees 2020-04-08 00:03:29 UTC
4.5 jobs were also marked broken and need to be reenabled when this is fixed.

Comment 2 Ben Parees 2020-05-19 13:25:46 UTC
my understanding was gcp-ovn was a supported feature in 4.5, what's the basis for deferring this?

Comment 3 Casey Callendrello 2020-05-19 14:04:01 UTC
Yeah, good question.

We have decent gcp coverage for ovn for the cluster-network-operator and ovn-kubernetes repositories. However, CI is still flaky (it will be fixed, bz1788309 ) and we made the call that the installer-ovn-kubernetes job could be deferred until that's fixed.

Seem reasonable? We didn't want to block all installer PRs unnecessarily.

Comment 4 Ben Parees 2020-05-19 14:12:29 UTC
As long as you have another basis for proving the feature works, it sounds ok to me.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.