Bug 1825085 - Duplicate "Annotations" appears in etcd-operator pod
Summary: Duplicate "Annotations" appears in etcd-operator pod
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: OpenShift Container Platform
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Networking
Version: 4.5
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: 4.5.0
Assignee: Tomofumi Hayashi
QA Contact: Weibin Liang
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-04-17 03:34 UTC by ge liu
Modified: 2020-07-13 17:28 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: No Doc Update
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-07-13 17:27:59 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2020:2409 0 None None None 2020-07-13 17:28:23 UTC

Comment 1 Standa Laznicka 2020-04-17 10:27:59 UTC
It appears like that because they are in fact there, and they are not doubled, one of the annotations is k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/network-status and the other one k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/networks-status. These seem to be added by multus, moving to sdn team.

Comment 2 Tomofumi Hayashi 2020-04-17 13:44:02 UTC
As Standa mentioned, this is not duplicated, 'k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/networks-status' and 'k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/network-status', networks v.s. network.

Let me introduce the history.
Previously multus-cni uses "k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/networks-status" for network status as original implementation. Then Kubernetes Networking Plumbing working group creates the de-facto standard, multi-net-spec.
https://github.com/k8snetworkplumbingwg/multi-net-spec/tree/master/v1.1

In this spec, "k8s.v1.cni.cncf.io/network-status" is used, then we, multus team in upstream, decides to change it.
Currently we're in transitional phase, hence we need to keep old one and new one for compatibility. That is why we have two status.
We are going to remove old one after a few releases.

So if you don't mind it, I am going to change this bz to 'closed'.
Please let me know if you have question/comments.

Comment 3 ge liu 2020-04-21 03:50:51 UTC
I agree with Tomofumi's comment 2, thanks

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2020-07-13 17:27:59 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:2409


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.