Bug 1825466 - python-pyside2 fails to build with Python 3.9: Unsupported python version detected
Summary: python-pyside2 fails to build with Python 3.9: Unsupported python version det...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: python-pyside2
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Richard Shaw
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: PYTHON39
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-04-18 09:55 UTC by Miro Hrončok
Modified: 2020-04-29 13:12 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-04-29 11:51:19 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Miro Hrončok 2020-04-18 09:55:41 UTC
python-pyside2 fails to build with Python 3.9.0a5.

+ /usr/bin/python3 setup.py egg_info
Unsupported python version detected. Only these python versions are supported: [(2, 7), (3, 5), (3, 6), (3, 7), (3, 8)]


Looks like https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pyside2/c/22c6a2816fb58fe2568cceae26d7668f454bd587?branch=master broke the patch. I'll try to correct it.

For the build logs, see:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@python/python3.9/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01337637-python-pyside2/

For all our attempts to build python-pyside2 with Python 3.9, see:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.9/package/python-pyside2/

Testing and mass rebuild of packages is happening in copr. You can follow these instructions to test locally in mock if your package builds with Python 3.9:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.9/

Let us know here if you have any questions.

Python 3.9 will be included in Fedora 33. To make that update smoother, we're building Fedora packages with early pre-releases of Python 3.9.
A build failure prevents us from testing all dependent packages (transitive [Build]Requires), so if this package is required a lot, it's important for us to get it fixed soon.
We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best, but if you don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work around it on our side.

Comment 2 Richard Shaw 2020-04-29 11:51:19 UTC
I merged the pull request so I think this can be closed now?

Comment 3 Miro Hrončok 2020-04-29 13:12:59 UTC
Yes, thanks.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.