Bug 1825539 - [Backport][RHOSP16.1] Support for redfish management cleaning steps in sushy-oem-idrac
Summary: [Backport][RHOSP16.1] Support for redfish management cleaning steps in sushy-...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DEFERRED
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat OpenStack
Classification: Red Hat
Component: python-sushy
Version: 16.0 (Train)
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: RHOS Maint
QA Contact: nlevinki
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: epmosp17features, epmosp17rfe 1718945 1825535
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-04-18 18:02 UTC by Chris Dearborn
Modified: 2022-06-02 13:03 UTC (History)
13 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-02-23 20:42:50 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
OpenStack gerrit 721596 0 None MERGED Add resources to put iDRAC in known good state 2021-06-09 16:43:02 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker OSP-15502 0 None None None 2022-06-02 13:03:51 UTC

Description Chris Dearborn 2020-04-18 18:02:48 UTC
Description of problem:
Support for redfish management cleaning steps in sushy-oem-idrac

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Julia Kreger 2020-08-13 14:05:14 UTC
It appears that this item requested for backport is pending on an upstream patch which has not gotten through the upstream review process. I've reached out to Richard Pioso who is the only individual with access to approve the patch to merge at this time. Once that merges, it seems reasonable that we can then evaluate the next step forward and if it will be possible to backport or not. Realistically, because this is setup as a branch-less library, we will likely need to carry a downstream patch to perform this functionality unless Dell can release a 0.0.3 version and ensure that no breaking changes are between that version and the current version on master branch.

Comment 2 Richard Pioso 2021-01-14 18:26:11 UTC
(In reply to Julia Kreger from comment #1)
> It appears that this item requested for backport is pending on an upstream
> patch which has not gotten through the upstream review process. I've reached
> out to Richard Pioso who is the only individual with access to approve the
> patch to merge at this time.

We added a couple of reviewers, Christopher Dearborn and Aija Jaunteva.

> Once that merges, it seems reasonable that we
> can then evaluate the next step forward and if it will be possible to
> backport or not.

Thank you, Julia!

> Realistically, because this is setup as a branch-less
> library, we will likely need to carry a downstream patch to perform this
> functionality unless Dell can release a 0.0.3 version and ensure that no
> breaking changes are between that version and the current version on master
> branch.

The library is fairly new. A branch was created for Victoria, stable/victoria. The changes will not be breaking.

Finally, we are actively reviewing the changes.

Comment 3 Steve Baker 2021-02-23 20:42:50 UTC
I think we should close these backport bugs until the changes have landed in upstream master, then we will have something to act on.

Also when we evaluate this for backport potential it will likely be targeted at 16.2


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.