Fedora Account System
Red Hat Associate
Red Hat Customer
Description of problem (please be detailed as possible and provide log snippests): When creating new OBCs via the Kube control plane (S3 works fine) - OBCs are being rejected - >message: NooBaa BackingStore "noobaa-default-backing-store" is in rejected phase >reason: RejectedBackingStore However, the backingstore is okay... message: BackingStorePhaseReady reason: 'Backing store mode: OPTIMAL' status: "True" type: Upgradeable mode: modeCode: OPTIMAL timeStamp: 2020-04-16 12:13:56.814669268 +0000 UTC m=+2.078978622 phase: Ready After talking to Danny from NooBaa, apparently there's a bug where a bucketclass will not automatically reconcile if its backingstore was in a rejected state in the initial check. Must-gather can be supplied upon request Version of all relevant components (if applicable): OCP 4.3.0-0.nightly-2020-04-16-053416 OCS v4.3.0-407.ci Does this issue impact your ability to continue to work with the product (please explain in detail what is the user impact)? Yes. It caused NooBaa to not work on a brand new cluster. Is there any workaround available to the best of your knowledge? Not that I know Rate from 1 - 5 the complexity of the scenario you performed that caused this bug (1 - very simple, 5 - very complex)? 3 Can this issue reproducible? Yes Can this issue reproduce from the UI? No If this is a regression, please provide more details to justify this: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create a backingstore that'll be rejected (I created one with a target bucket that doesn't exist) 2. Create a bucketclass that uses the backingstore - the bucketclass is instantly rejected 3. Fix the backingstore (I created a target bucket with a name that fits the name I used in the backingstore creation) 4. The bucketclass remains rejected Actual results: The bucketclass is rejected Expected results: The bucketclass reconciles and its state changes to ready
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:2393