Description of problem: Version of tasks in 6.7 uses 'foreman_tasks/tasks' as controller name for bookmarks, but Satellites <6.7 used 'foreman_tasks_tasks'. This has several outcomes: 1) The user cannot see the default bookmarks we ship 2) The user can CRUD new bookmarks, we will need to take care of this when fixing this. 3) If the user upgraded from previous release, they won't be able to see any of their old bookmarks. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): tfm-rubygem-foreman-tasks-0.17.5.2-1.el7sat.noarch How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Go to tasks index 2. Run the following on satelltie to get counts of bookmarks foreman-rake console <<EOF %w(_ /).each do |separator| controller = 'foreman_tasks' + separator + 'tasks' puts "#{controller}: #{Bookmark.where(:controller => controller).count}" end EOF 3. Click the bookmark button next to the search bar 4. Create a new bookmark 5. Rerun command from 2. Actual results: There are no bookmarks in step 3, although data from step 2 say there should be some. In the output of step 5, we can see the number of bookmarks assigned with foreman_tasks/tasks goes up. Expected results: Bookmarks we ship and bookmarks user created before upgrade are shown there. In the output of step 5, we can see the number of bookmarks assigned with foreman_tasks_tasks goes up, foreman_tasks/tasks is zero.
Created redmine issue https://projects.theforeman.org/issues/29594 from this bug
*** Bug 1826756 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 1833264 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Upstream bug assigned to rlavi
Verified on Satellite 6.8 snap 6, default and added bookmarks are displayed in tasks UI, upgrade automation being added
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Important: Satellite 6.8 release), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:4366