Bug 1828914 - python-jsonpickle: provide Python 3 package for EPEL 8
Summary: python-jsonpickle: provide Python 3 package for EPEL 8
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: python-jsonpickle
Version: epel8
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ralph Bean
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 1813735
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-04-28 15:02 UTC by Felix Schwarz
Modified: 2020-06-04 00:49 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: python-jsonpickle-1.4.1-4.el8
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-06-04 00:49:13 UTC
Type: Enhancement
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Felix Schwarz 2020-04-28 15:02:30 UTC
In order to get python-certbot-dns-digitalocean in EPEL8 we need a python-digitalocean package. Please let me know if I should provide a pull request.

Comment 1 Gwyn Ciesla 2020-05-14 15:36:10 UTC
We still lack python3-demjson, python3-feedparser, and python3-setuptools_scm >= 3.4.1 in EPEL. However, python3-setuptools_scm is a RHEL package, so may not be able to be updated.

Comment 2 Felix Schwarz 2020-05-14 21:51:28 UTC
I don't see things as bleak: Most of the dependencies are just optional and the tests will skip them. I'll try to come up with some changesets in a local branch for review (may take a few days though). Afterwards you could create an EPEL 8 branch and I'll submit a merge request.

Comment 3 Gwyn Ciesla 2020-05-14 21:55:01 UTC
Sounds like a plan.

Comment 4 Felix Schwarz 2020-05-15 08:41:12 UTC
This was easier than expected: https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/fschwarz/rpms/python-jsonpickle/tree/epel8

From what I saw in the jsonpickle repo you would treat EPEL branches separately from the Fedora branches (separate commits) so I just started without a history and tried to make the spec file as clean as possible instead of trying to use a single spec file in Fedora+EPEL (with regular branch merges). Of course I could also change that approach to a unified spec file.

Building in mock needs an extra step currently because zstd was retired in EPEL (provided by RHEL Base) but is not yet available in CentOS: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/MFZCRQCULJALRIJJFSSAETSDZ4RL6GCU/

You can work around the issue by extending /etc/mock/templates/epel-8.tpl with the EPEL 8.1 snapshot repo:

[epel81-archive]
name=EPEL 8.1 archive
baseurl=https://archives.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/epel/8.1/Everything/x86_64/
gpgcheck=1
enabled=0
gpgkey=file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/epel/RPM-GPG-KEY-EPEL-8

$ fedpkg --release=epel8 mockbuild --enablerepo=epel81-archive

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2020-05-19 15:02:39 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-12089a3a65 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-12089a3a65

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2020-05-20 05:13:54 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-12089a3a65 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-12089a3a65

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2020-06-04 00:49:13 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-12089a3a65 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.