Bug 183039 - Review Request: perl-Spoon
Review Request: perl-Spoon
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Jason Tibbitts
Fedora Package Reviews List
:
Depends On: 183028 183038
Blocks: FE-ACCEPT 183040
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2006-02-25 13:36 EST by Steven Pritchard
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-03-10 13:48:09 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Steven Pritchard 2006-02-25 13:36:11 EST
Spec Name or Url: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Spoon/perl-Spoon.spec
SRPM Name or Url: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Spoon-0.23-1.src.rpm
Description:
Spoon is an Application Framework that is designed primarily for
building Social Software web applications. The Kwiki wiki software is
built on top of Spoon.
Comment 1 Steven Pritchard 2006-02-27 17:57:55 EST
http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Spoon-0.23-2.src.rpm

* Mon Feb 27 2006 Steven Pritchard <steve@kspei.com> 0.23-2
- Drop explicit BR: perl.
Comment 2 Jason Tibbitts 2006-02-28 21:25:50 EST
The Source0 URL doesn't exist for me; I suggest using
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/I/IN/INGY/Spoon-0.23.tar.gz

I suggest a more meaningful Summary:.  The documentation uses "A spiffy
application building framework"; that would work, or something distilled from
%description, like "A framework for building social software web applications".

Other than that, everything looks good.  Once IO-All has been built and pushed
I'll do the mock builds and final Provides:/Requires: checks.
Comment 3 Jason Tibbitts 2006-03-02 09:57:26 EST
I added a local repo to my mock setup so that I don't have to wait before the
dependent packages get into the main repo.  Don't know why I didn't think of it
earlier.  Anyway,

Approved, subject to the addition of a meaningful summary.
Comment 4 Steven Pritchard 2006-03-10 13:48:09 EST
Summary changed appropriately and packages built.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.