Bug 183041 - Review Request: perl-Kwiki-ModPerl
Summary: Review Request: perl-Kwiki-ModPerl
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jason Tibbitts
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 183040
Blocks: FE-ACCEPT
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-02-25 18:56 UTC by Steven Pritchard
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-03-15 23:59:52 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Steven Pritchard 2006-02-25 18:56:01 UTC
Spec Name or Url: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Kwiki-ModPerl/perl-Kwiki-ModPerl.spec
SRPM Name or Url: http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Kwiki-ModPerl-0.09-1.src.rpm
Description:
Kwiki mod_perl plugin.

Comment 1 Steven Pritchard 2006-02-27 22:59:31 UTC
http://ftp.kspei.com/pub/steve/rpms/perl-Kwiki-ModPerl-0.09-2.src.rpm

* Mon Feb 27 2006 Steven Pritchard <steve> 0.09-2
- Drop explicit BR: perl.


Comment 2 Jason Tibbitts 2006-03-02 17:39:23 UTC
Not much more to say here.  Summary needs fixing, but otherwise everything is
fine.   The Requires: perl(Kwiki) >= 0.32 is unnecessary as RPM will find the
Kwiki dependency and no older version exists in extras.  Interestingly, RPM
doesn't find the mod_perl2 requirement.

Approved; please supply a better summary when you check in.

Comment 3 Paul Howarth 2006-03-02 17:49:47 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> The Requires: perl(Kwiki) >= 0.32 is unnecessary as RPM will find the
> Kwiki dependency and no older version exists in extras.

Whilst the versioned perl(Kwiki) dep doesn't need to be versioned for Extras, it
may be useful for those people that rebuild Extras packages for different
distributions (not an uncommon thing). It might be argued that adding a
versioned dep clutters the spec file but I think that it's a personal preference
issue for the maintainer rather than something that should be fixed. IMHO.


Comment 4 Jason Tibbitts 2006-03-02 17:53:43 UTC
Sorry, I meant to indicate explicitly that this wasn't a blocker, as I did in my
other review.  I just wanted to point out that RPM will find the perl(Kwiki)
dependency on its own so there's no need to list it.

The package is approved in any case.

Comment 5 Steven Pritchard 2006-03-02 18:00:11 UTC
For the record, those versioned deps are generated by cpanspec.  (Try "cpanspec
-v Kwiki::ModPerl" if you want to see exactly what I was working from.)  I
usually don't trim them, even if they aren't strictly necessary.  I usually do
remove non-versioned deps, and Core module dependencies are automatically
removed by cpanspec.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.