Bug 183541 – CVE-2006-0749 Firefox Tag Order Vulnerability

Bug 183541 - CVE-2006-0749 Firefox Tag Order Vulnerability

Summary:	CVE-2006-0749 Firefox Tag Order Vulnerability

Status:	CLOSED ERRATA

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	firefox (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	4
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	medium Severity urgent
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Christopher Aillon
QA Contact:
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:	source=mozilla,reported=20051213,emba...
Keywords:	Security

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2006-03-01 16:08 EST by Josh Bressers
Modified:	2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
CC List:	3 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:	1.0.8-1.1.fc4
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2006-07-25 19:54:14 EDT
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

External Trackers
Tracker	ID	Priority	Status	Summary	Last Updated
Mozilla Foundation	320182	None	None	None	Never

Groups: None (edit)

Description Josh Bressers 2006-03-01 16:08:33 EST

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #183537 +++

There exists a remotely exploitable code execution vulnerability in Mozilla
Firefox related to the order tags appear in an HTML document.  It is possible
for a malicious web page to execute arbitrary code as the user running Firefox.

Proposed upstream patch is attachment 125496 [details]

Comment 1 Josh Bressers 2006-04-24 08:23:43 EDT

Lifting embargo

Comment 2 Matthew Miller 2006-07-25 19:49:16 EDT

This doesn't appear to ever have been fixed. Remotely-exploitable vulnerability,
too. :(

Comment 3 Matthew Miller 2006-07-25 19:54:14 EDT

Hmmm, okay, looks like this issue is fixed in 1.0.8, and there *was* an update
to that, and apparently before the embargo was lifted (hence the lack of
specific mention in its changelog). The bugzilla entry just needed some lovin'.
Marking closed-errata.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.