Description of problem: Unable to update openjfx package because of old openjfx-src package Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): $ rpm -qa openjfx\* openjfx-8.0.202-8.b07.fc31.x86_64 openjfx-devel-8.0.202-8.b07.fc31.x86_64 openjfx-src-8.0.202-8.b07.fc31.x86_64 How reproducible: Everytime Steps to Reproduce: 1. Run "sudo dnf update" command 2. 3. Actual results: $ sudo dnf update Dependencies resolved. Problem 1: package openjfx-src-8.0.202-8.b07.fc31.x86_64 requires openjfx(x86-64) = 8.0.202-8.b07.fc31, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both openjfx-8.0.202-10.b07.fc32.x86_64 and openjfx-8.0.202-8.b07.fc31.x86_64 - cannot install both openjfx-8.0.202-8.b07.fc31.x86_64 and openjfx-8.0.202-10.b07.fc32.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package openjfx-src-8.0.202-8.b07.fc31.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package openjfx-8.0.202-8.b07.fc31.x86_64 Problem 2: problem with installed package openjfx-src-8.0.202-8.b07.fc31.x86_64 - package openjfx-src-8.0.202-8.b07.fc31.x86_64 requires openjfx(x86-64) = 8.0.202-8.b07.fc31, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both openjfx-8.0.202-10.b07.fc32.x86_64 and openjfx-8.0.202-8.b07.fc31.x86_64 - cannot install both openjfx-8.0.202-8.b07.fc31.x86_64 and openjfx-8.0.202-10.b07.fc32.x86_64 - package openjfx-devel-8.0.202-10.b07.fc32.x86_64 requires openjfx(x86-64) = 8.0.202-10.b07.fc32, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package openjfx-devel-8.0.202-8.b07.fc31.x86_64 ================================================================================ Package Architecture Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Skipping packages with conflicts: (add '--best --allowerasing' to command line to force their upgrade): openjfx x86_64 8.0.202-10.b07.fc32 updates 8.7 M Skipping packages with broken dependencies: openjfx-devel x86_64 8.0.202-10.b07.fc32 updates 1.0 M Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Skip 2 Packages Nothing to do. Complete! Expected results: openjfx-src package should also be provided. Additional info:
I don't plan to provide openjfx-src anymore. But it depend for which use the users needs openjfx-src. Why does you need openjfx-src?
Thank you for your contact. Actually, openjfx-src is not mandatory, I just waited for the update for two weeks then reported this bug. I think if I have openjfx-src package, I can use shortcut F3 in eclipse to check openjfx Classes' source code, it is easier for me than searching for javadoc.
FEDORA-2020-96b5511dfa has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-96b5511dfa
FEDORA-2020-96b5511dfa has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-96b5511dfa` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-96b5511dfa See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
Thank you very much for your contact. I upgrade to the newest openjfx-src package and it worked for me.
openjfx-8.0.202-12.b07.fc32 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.