RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1837315 - Healthcheck code DSBLE0002 not returned on disabled suffix
Summary: Healthcheck code DSBLE0002 not returned on disabled suffix
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Classification: Red Hat
Component: 389-ds-base
Version: 8.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: 8.0
Assignee: mreynolds
QA Contact: RHDS QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-05-19 09:11 UTC by bsmejkal
Modified: 2021-05-18 15:45 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 389-ds-devel-1.4-8040020201105165416.866effaa
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-05-18 15:45:16 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
pm-rhel: mirror+

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github 389ds 389-ds-base issues 4159 0 None closed Healthcheck code DSBLE0002 not returned on disabled suffix 2020-11-23 15:26:15 UTC

Description bsmejkal 2020-05-19 09:11:57 UTC 
Description of problem:
DSBLE0002 should be returned when suffix is disabled.
But running healthcheck returns only the warning message and it stops checking other components.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
389-ds-base-1.4.3.8-2.module+el8.3.0+6591+ebfc9766.x86_64

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a new root suffix:
# ldapmodify -a -p 389 -h localhost -D "cn=Directory manager" -w password
dn: cn="dc=test,dc=com",cn=mapping tree, cn=config
objectclass: top
objectclass: extensibleObject
objectclass: nsMappingTree
nsslapd-state: backend
nsslapd-backend: userData
cn: dc=test,dc=com


2. Add a database for this suffix :
# ldapmodify -a -p 389 -h localhost -D "cn=Directory manager" -w password
dn: cn=userdata,cn=ldbm database,cn=plugins,cn=config             
objectclass: extensibleObject
objectclass: nsBackendInstance
nsslapd-suffix: dc=test,dc=com  


3. Disable the suffix
# ldapmodify -p 389 -h localhost -D "cn=Directory manager" -w password
dn: cn="dc=test,dc=com",cn=mapping tree,cn=config
changetype: modify
replace: nsslapd-state
nsslapd-state: disabled


Actual results:

# dsctl instance healthcheck 
Beginning lint report, this could take a while ...
Checking Backends ...
Error: Operations error - Warning: Operation attempted on a disabled node : dc=test,dc=com


Expected results:

DS Lint Error: DSBLE0002
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity: HIGH
Affects:
 -- dc=test,dc=com

Details:
-----------
Unable to query the backend.  LDAP error ({'desc': 'Operations error', 'info': 'Warning: Operation attempted on a disabled node : dc=test,dc=com\n'})

Resolution:
-----------
Check the server's error and access logs for more information.


Additional info:
Comment 1 mreynolds 2020-05-21 20:37:58 UTC 
Upstream ticket:
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/51106
Comment 6 bsmejkal 2020-11-25 14:51:29 UTC 
==================================================================================== test session starts =====================================================================================
platform linux -- Python 3.6.8, pytest-6.1.2, py-1.9.0, pluggy-0.13.1 -- /usr/bin/python3.6
cachedir: .pytest_cache
metadata: {'Python': '3.6.8', 'Platform': 'Linux-4.18.0-252.el8.x86_64-x86_64-with-redhat-8.4-Ootpa', 'Packages': {'pytest': '6.1.2', 'py': '1.9.0', 'pluggy': '0.13.1'}, 'Plugins': {'metadata': '1.10.0', 'html': '3.0.0', 'libfaketime': '0.1.2'}}
389-ds-base: 1.4.3.16-2.module+el8.4.0+8803+fd0f8fe3
nss: 3.53.1-11.el8_2
nspr: 4.25.0-2.el8_2
openldap: 2.4.46-16.el8
cyrus-sasl: 2.1.27-5.el8
FIPS: disabled
rootdir: /mnt/tests/rhds/tests/upstream/ds/dirsrvtests, configfile: pytest.ini
plugins: metadata-1.10.0, html-3.0.0, libfaketime-0.1.2
collected 11 items / 9 deselected / 2 selected                                                                                                                                               

dirsrvtests/tests/suites/healthcheck/healthcheck_test.py::test_healthcheck_disabled_suffix PASSED                                                                                      [ 50%]
dirsrvtests/tests/suites/healthcheck/healthcheck_test.py::test_healthcheck_unable_to_query_backend PASSED                                                                              [100%]

======================================================================= 2 passed in 11.45s ==================================================================================================

Marking as Verified:Tested.
Comment 9 sgouvern 2020-11-30 16:41:28 UTC 
verified:tested (see comment 6) with build 389-ds-1.4-8040020201125182123.866effaa / 389-ds-base-libs-1.4.3.16-2.module+el8.4.0+8803+fd0f8fe3.x86_64
-> marking as VERIFIED
Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2021-05-18 15:45:16 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (389-ds:1.4 bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:1835
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.