Spec URL: https://appadeia.fedorapeople.org/packaging/golang-github-xiaq-persistent/golang-github-xiaq-persistent.spec SRPM URL: https://appadeia.fedorapeople.org/packaging/golang-github-xiaq-persistent/golang-github-xiaq-persistent-0-0.1.20200520gita1d9ac4.fc32.src.rpm Description: Persistent data structure in Go Fedora Account System Username: appadeia
- Could you please double check the hashing mismatch for the source before the import? - "%global golicenses epl-v10.html" could replace the "%license epl-v10.html" entry in the %files section. I guess that the go2rpm script was not able to pick the file up. Not a blocker but would be more aligned with Go spec files. Otherwise looks good, package APPROVED. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Note: Upstream MD5sum check error, diff is in /home/fab/Documents/repos/reviews/1837793-golang-github-xiaq- persistent/diff.txt See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/ ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla upstream sources. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated". 1 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/fab/Documents/repos/reviews/1837793-golang-github-xiaq- persistent/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com(golang-github-dchest-uniuri-devel, golang-github-gopherjs-devel, golang-github-glycerine-unsnap-stream- [...] golang-github-nkovacs-streamquote-devel, golang-github-10gen-escaper- devel) [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Note: Bad spec filename: /home/fab/Documents/repos/reviews/1837793-golang-github-xiaq- persistent/srpm-unpacked/golang-github-xiaq-persistent.spec See: (this test has no URL) [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). Rpmlint ------- Checking: golang-github-xiaq-persistent-devel-0-0.1.20200520gita1d9ac4.fc33.noarch.rpm golang-github-xiaq-persistent-0-0.1.20200520gita1d9ac4.fc33.src.rpm golang-github-xiaq-persistent-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/xiaq/persistent/.goipath golang-github-xiaq-persistent.src: W: no-%build-section 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- warning: Found bdb Packages database while attempting sqlite backend: using bdb backend. warning: Found bdb Packages database while attempting sqlite backend: using bdb backend. golang-github-xiaq-persistent-devel.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: https://github.com/xiaq/persistent <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known> golang-github-xiaq-persistent-devel.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/xiaq/persistent/.goipath 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/xiaq/persistent/archive/a1d9ac4077fcad050b845856c51643c30795a171/persistent-a1d9ac4077fcad050b845856c51643c30795a171.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 81bef02054bc2a1867daf64f55b281ef7f3bea077dfa4e4e7ac877ff4f5d0ece CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 462d6e6fd52d19467f1045fe1ffda2b6f33aced17afd389f4f9b95f91b8e5f54 diff -r also reports differences Requires -------- golang-github-xiaq-persistent-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): go-filesystem Provides -------- golang-github-xiaq-persistent-devel: golang(github.com/xiaq/persistent) golang(github.com/xiaq/persistent)(commit=a1d9ac4077fcad050b845856c51643c30795a171) golang(github.com/xiaq/persistent/hash) golang(github.com/xiaq/persistent/hash)(commit=a1d9ac4077fcad050b845856c51643c30795a171) golang(github.com/xiaq/persistent/hashmap) golang(github.com/xiaq/persistent/hashmap)(commit=a1d9ac4077fcad050b845856c51643c30795a171) golang(github.com/xiaq/persistent/list) golang(github.com/xiaq/persistent/list)(commit=a1d9ac4077fcad050b845856c51643c30795a171) golang(github.com/xiaq/persistent/vector) golang(github.com/xiaq/persistent/vector)(commit=a1d9ac4077fcad050b845856c51643c30795a171) golang-github-xiaq-persistent-devel golang-ipath(github.com/xiaq/persistent) golang-ipath(github.com/xiaq/persistent)(commit=a1d9ac4077fcad050b845856c51643c30795a171) Generated by fedora-review 0.7.5 (5fa5b7e) last change: 2020-02-16 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1837793 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic Disabled plugins: R, fonts, Java, Haskell, Python, Ocaml, PHP, C/C++, Perl, SugarActivity Disabled flags: EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH, EXARCH
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-xiaq-persistent
FEDORA-2020-5518ca9f02 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-5518ca9f02
FEDORA-2020-5518ca9f02 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-5518ca9f02 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-5518ca9f02 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2020-5518ca9f02 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.