Bug 1838001 - Namespace isolation fails due to Sg remote_group_id usage
Summary: Namespace isolation fails due to Sg remote_group_id usage
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: OpenShift Container Platform
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Networking
Version: 3.11.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
urgent
Target Milestone: ---
: 3.11.z
Assignee: Luis Tomas Bolivar
QA Contact: Jon Uriarte
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-05-20 11:04 UTC by Luis Tomas Bolivar
Modified: 2020-05-28 05:44 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-05-28 05:44:13 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github openshift kuryr-kubernetes pull 232 0 None closed Bug 1838001: Remove remote_group_id usage at loadbalancer SGs 2020-09-16 11:52:06 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2020:2215 0 None None None 2020-05-28 05:44:20 UTC

Description Luis Tomas Bolivar 2020-05-20 11:04:40 UTC
When deploying OCP (3.11) on OSP (13) environment the namespace isolation is not enforced since the connectivity between 2 namespaces succeeds when it shouldn't.

This happens due to the usage of remote_group_id at Neutron Security groups which is affected by this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1831044

Kuryr should avoid the usage of remote_group_id and use remote_ip_prefix instead on its security groups

Comment 3 Jon Uriarte 2020-05-22 15:07:52 UTC
Verified in openshift-ansible-3.11.219 (2020-05-20.1) on top of OSP 13 2020-05-19.2.

Namespace isolation is working as expected, tempests namespace isolation tests pass
and manual tests as well.
Could not reproduce the issue described in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1831044

The security groups openshift-ansible-openshift.example.com-allow_from_default,
openshift-ansible-openshift.example.com-allow_from_namespace, and the ones belonging to load
balancer's ports do not have a Remote Security Group .

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2020-05-28 05:44:13 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:2215


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.