Bug 184063 - undefined symbol: alutInit
undefined symbol: alutInit
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 181915
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: openal (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Andreas Bierfert
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2006-03-05 15:09 EST by James Sturgis
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2006-03-05 18:44:14 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description James Sturgis 2006-03-05 15:09:02 EST
Description of problem:
this happened to me too:
Scot L. Harris wrote:

I found the openal package in FC Extras.



./X-Plane-i586: symbol lookup error: ./X-Plane-i586: undefined symbol:

Running the following command on the libopenal.so.0.0 library seems to
indicate that the symbols have been stripped.

nm /usr/lib/libopenal.so.0.0.0
nm: /usr/lib/libopenal.so.0.0.0: no symbols

Which would seem to explain the undefined symbol for alutInit.

Because the debugging info has been stripped.

Is there a reason this library was built this way?

$ yum install openal-debuginfo
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.0.9-0.4.2
I tried to install openal-debuginfo as above but my system does not show
a 0.0.9-0.4.2, just the previous version:
openal-debuginfo.i386      0.0.8-1.2.fc4.rf       installed.

My previous openal installation worked with the same X-Plane software that now

How reproducible: 100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. cd to X-Plane\ 8.20 subdirectory
2. ./X-Plane-athlon-xp
3. result is:
[root@flight X-Plane 8.20]# ./X-Plane-athlon-xp
./X-Plane-athlon-xp: symbol lookup error: ./X-Plane-athlon-xp: undefined symbol:
[root@flight X-Plane 8.20]#

Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:
Comment 1 Michael Schwendt 2006-03-05 18:44:14 EST

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 181915 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.