Bug 1840847 - [sig-network] NetworkPolicy [LinuxOnly] NetworkPolicy between server and client should enforce policy to allow traffic from pods within server namespace based on PodSelector [Feature:NetworkPolicy]
Summary: [sig-network] NetworkPolicy [LinuxOnly] NetworkPolicy between server and clie...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1841339
Alias: None
Product: OpenShift Container Platform
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Networking
Version: 4.5
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Linux
unspecified
high
Target Milestone: ---
: 4.6.0
Assignee: Ben Bennett
QA Contact: zhaozhanqi
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-05-27 17:26 UTC by Danil Grigorev
Modified: 2020-06-01 14:13 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
[sig-network] NetworkPolicy [LinuxOnly] NetworkPolicy between server and client should enforce policy to allow traffic from pods within server namespace based on PodSelector [Feature:NetworkPolicy]
Last Closed: 2020-06-01 14:13:34 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Danil Grigorev 2020-05-27 17:26:51 UTC 
test:
[sig-network] NetworkPolicy [LinuxOnly] NetworkPolicy between server and client should enforce policy to allow traffic from pods within server namespace based on PodSelector [Feature:NetworkPolicy] 

is failing frequently in CI, see search results:
https://search.svc.ci.openshift.org/?maxAge=168h&context=1&type=bug%2Bjunit&name=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job&search=%5C%5Bsig-network%5C%5D+NetworkPolicy+%5C%5BLinuxOnly%5C%5D+NetworkPolicy+between+server+and+client+should+enforce+policy+to+allow+traffic+from+pods+within+server+namespace+based+on+PodSelector+%5C%5BFeature%3ANetworkPolicy%5C%5D
Comment 1 Tomas Smetana 2020-05-28 13:06:22 UTC 
This has to be investigated but doesn't qualify for a 4.5 blocker.
Comment 2 Tomas Smetana 2020-06-01 14:13:34 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1841339 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.