RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Description of problem:
manual page  | wrong word    | correct word 
-------------+---------------+--------------
dictionary.5 | defintions    | definitions
radiusd.8    | users's       | user's or users'
radiusd.8    | Ofcourse      | Of course

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHEL-8.2
freeradius-3.0.17-7.module+el8.2.0+4847+336970e8.x86_64

How reproducible:
always

Steps to reproduce:
1. man <anything-from-1st-column>
2. search for <anything-from-2nd-column>

Actual results:
There are typo errors in the man page.

Expected results:
There are no typo errors in the man page.

This isn't important here, but I find it interesting, so:

While you're right that it's wrong in this case (should be user's), some styles of written English (Chicago, Strunk and White, others) do allow for unconditionally adding the "'s" - which means that "users's" is not always incorrect (though again, it's wrong here).  There isn't agreement about this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostrophe#Singular_nouns_ending_with_an_%22s%22_or_%22z%22_sound

Since it seems like we're going to be respinning this anyways... Mind acking this Filip? I'll put it in the next build.


Moving to POST:

commit 6f9d6e9765f0c06ca4bb0be28be73fffd56b9318
Author: Alexander Scheel <ascheel>
Date:   Tue Jun 9 12:02:47 2020 -0400

    Minor spelling fixes in man files
    
    Signed-off-by: Alexander Scheel <ascheel>

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (freeradius bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:4317