Bug 1846671
| Summary: | Highlight relantionship between defaultNodeSelector and pod's nodeSelector | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Olimp Bockowski <obockows> |
| Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | Michael Burke <mburke> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | RamaKasturi <knarra> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | Vikram Goyal <vigoyal> |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 4.4 | CC: | aos-bugs, jokerman, knarra, mburke |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | 4.4.z | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2021-03-10 22:22:53 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 1846669 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Olimp Bockowski
2020-06-12 14:45:32 UTC
Doc PR: https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/29102 I used this statement, which was added to the docs in a previous PR. "With cluster-wide node selectors, when you create a pod in that cluster, OpenShift Container Platform adds the default node selectors to the pod and schedules the pod on nodes with matching labels." https://github.com/openshift/openshift-docs/pull/24865/files#diff-192126d49440cee046a761c16328f125c67ff2eabd68cb37ee8e025849adf632R10 Also used the wording in https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.6/rest_api/config_apis/scheduler-config-openshift-io-v1.html#specification defaultNodeSelector This is applied to the pods created in all namespaces and creates an intersection with any existing nodeSelectors already set on a pod, additionally constraining that pod’s selector. Namespaces having project-wide node selectors won’t be impacted even if this field is set. Xiaoli -- Can you please assign this BZ for QE review? Thank you very much. Michael Kasturi -- Is this an issue that you can review for QE? Thank you Michael Hi Michael, I have reviewed the PR and add /lgtm label. Let me know if the bug here can be moved to verified state now, i can do that, thanks !! Since i am the QE contact and did what all is needed for this bug, clearing need infos. Thank you !! Rama -- Yes, when you approve of the changes in the PR, you can move the BZ to Verified. Thank you for the review! Michael super, thanks for your work |