Hide Forgot
Hi, previously (in fc31) you could simply do dnf history list | tac to get the history in a suitable (for me) output. Now, in fc32, you can still do that, but the output looks kind of messy and is absolutely unusable. The same happens if you pipe the history output into less. The tabular output of 'history list' is nice to see in reverse directly supported by dnf, then we wouldn't need to mangle it with 'tac' (or, if that solution is better, fix the output of 'history list' so we can process if further with tools like less, tac, ...)
PR: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/1632 test: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/ci-dnf-stack/pull/852
Now it is possible to call dnf history list --reverse to get the output in reverse order. The reason why piping to tac printed the output bad formatted is that the behaviour was changed in [1] and [2] to obtain a nice trimmed rows output for terminal and not trimmed rows to file or pagers like less. [1] https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/commit/fc31c508fb24730ae4f44f9cf9da9f8ffb9359f9 [2] https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/commit/86d741f442f4da2125e6a6ea2f85cd022e29ce5a
The --reverse option is a good change, but as of dnf v4.2.23 it does not work even though it is mentioned in the documentation. Perhaps the changes have not been released yet? https://dnf.readthedocs.io/en/latest/command_ref.html#history-command-label dnf history [list] [--reverse] [<spec>...] --reverse The order of history list output is printed in reverse order. $ dnf history list --reverse usage: dnf history [-c [config file]] [-q] [-v] [--version] [--installroot [path]] [--nodocs] [--noplugins] [--enableplugin [plugin]] [--disableplugin [plugin]] [--releasever RELEASEVER] [--setopt SETOPTS] [--skip-broken] [-h] [--allowerasing] [-b | --nobest] [-C] [-R [minutes]] [-d [debug level]] [--debugsolver] [--showduplicates] [-e ERRORLEVEL] [--obsoletes] [--rpmverbosity [debug level name]] [-y] [--assumeno] [--enablerepo [repo]] [--disablerepo [repo] | --repo [repo]] [--enable | --disable] [-x [package]] [--disableexcludes [repo]] [--repofrompath [repo,path]] [--noautoremove] [--nogpgcheck] [--color COLOR] [--refresh] [-4] [-6] [--destdir DESTDIR] [--downloadonly] [--comment COMMENT] [--bugfix] [--enhancement] [--newpackage] [--security] [--advisory ADVISORY] [--bz BUGZILLA] [--cve CVES] [--sec-severity {Critical,Important,Moderate,Low}] [--forcearch ARCH] [COMMAND] [TRANSACTION [TRANSACTION ...]] dnf history: error: unrecognized arguments: --reverse
FEDORA-2020-b40fc174b5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-b40fc174b5
FEDORA-2020-5d9f0ce2b3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-5d9f0ce2b3
FEDORA-2020-b40fc174b5 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-b40fc174b5` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-b40fc174b5 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2020-5d9f0ce2b3 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-5d9f0ce2b3` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-5d9f0ce2b3 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2020-5d9f0ce2b3 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
FEDORA-2020-b40fc174b5 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.