Verified on ovn2.11.1-53: + echo 'nameserver 192.168.0.254' + ip netns exec server1 ping aaa -c 1 PING aaa (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=4.13 ms --- aaa ping statistics --- 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.130/4.130/4.130/0.000 ms + ip netns exec server1 ping aAa -c 1 PING aAa (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=0.825 ms --- aAa ping statistics --- 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.825/0.825/0.825/0.000 ms <=== ping passed [root@dell-per740-42 bz1846849]# rpm -qa | grep -E "openvswitch|ovn" ovn2.11-host-2.11.1-53.el7fdp.x86_64 openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy-1.0-15.el7fdp.noarch ovn2.11-central-2.11.1-53.el7fdp.x86_64 openvswitch2.11-2.11.0-50.el7fdp.x86_64 ovn2.11-2.11.1-53.el7fdp.x86_64
Verified on fdp8: + ip netns exec server1 ping aaa -c 1 PING aaa (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=4.60 ms --- aaa ping statistics --- 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 4.602/4.602/4.602/0.000 ms + ip netns exec server1 ping aAa -c 1 PING aAa (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=63 time=0.884 ms --- aAa ping statistics --- 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.884/0.884/0.884/0.000 ms [root@hp-dl380pg8-12 bz1846849]# rpm -qa | grep -E "openvswitch|ovn" ovn2.11-host-2.11.1-53.el8fdp.x86_64 openvswitch-selinux-extra-policy-1.0-23.el8fdp.noarch ovn2.11-central-2.11.1-53.el8fdp.x86_64 openvswitch2.11-2.11.0-50.el8fdp.x86_64 ovn2.11-2.11.1-53.el8fdp.x86_64
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (ovn2.11 bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:3487