lilypond is currently a requirement to install Frescobaldi. I suggest to make it a weak dependency (recommends). As Debian does, see: https://packages.debian.org/buster/frescobaldi This would allow to easily install Frescobaldi indipendently from lilypond (and its many dependencies, including texlive). Several users prefer installing the "self-contained" installers available on lilypond.org. For a number of good reasons. A weak dependency would be a good option for them. PS I thought I made a similar report some months ago, but I cannot find it anymore. I hope I've not duplicated it.
Are you thinking Recommends: or Suggests: ? https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/WeakDependencies/ I'm thinking Suggests.
IIUC, Suggests: is a hint and hints are by default ignored by dnf. So lilypond would not be installed by default. Recommends: is a weak dependency, which is added to the dnf transaction. So lilypond would be installed by default, unless --setopt=install_weak_deps=False is used. It could also be removed later without forcing the uninstallation of Frescobaldi. If my understanding is correct, I would lean towards Recommends. Easier for regular users, but still configurable for advanced users.
Works for me. I'll build this when koji is back to full speed.
FEDORA-2020-1b4d9096a5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1b4d9096a5
FEDORA-2020-1b4d9096a5 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-1b4d9096a5` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-1b4d9096a5 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2020-1b4d9096a5 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.