RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1848953 - ssh auth failing with avc denial for krb5_0.rcache2
Summary: ssh auth failing with avc denial for krb5_0.rcache2
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Classification: Red Hat
Component: selinux-policy
Version: 8.3
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
high
Target Milestone: rc
: 8.3
Assignee: Zdenek Pytela
QA Contact: Milos Malik
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1847221 1857253 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: 1842946
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-06-19 11:02 UTC by Kaleem
Modified: 2020-11-04 01:58 UTC (History)
13 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-11-04 01:56:46 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
pm-rhel: mirror+


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2020:4528 0 None None None 2020-11-04 01:57:16 UTC

Description Kaleem 2020-06-19 11:02:21 UTC
Description of problem:

ssh auth with krb5 credentials fails and following avc denial seen. Same scenario works fine when selinux is put in permissive mode.

snip from /var/log/secure

Jun 19 06:48:41 master sshd[24487]: debug3: monitor_read: checking request 44
Jun 19 06:48:41 master sshd[24487]: debug1: Unspecified GSS failure.  Minor code may provide more information\nPermission denied (filename: /var/tmp/krb5_0.rcache2)\n\n
Jun 19 06:48:41 master sshd[24487]: debug1: Got no client credentials


[root@dhcp107-3 ~]# ausearch -m avc 
----
time->Fri Jun 19 06:48:41 2020
type=PROCTITLE msg=audit(1592563721.621:1796): proctitle=737368643A2061646D696E205B707269765D
type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1592563721.621:1796): arch=c000003e syscall=257 success=no exit=-13 a0=ffffff9c a1=55a61a62f780 a2=20042 a3=180 items=0 ppid=23006 pid=24487 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm="sshd" exe="/usr/sbin/sshd" subj=system_u:system_r:sshd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 key=(null)
type=AVC msg=audit(1592563721.621:1796): avc:  denied  { write } for  pid=24487 comm="sshd" name="krb5_0.rcache2" dev="vda3" ino=25190336 scontext=system_u:system_r:sshd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tcontext=system_u:object_r:smbd_tmp_t:s0 tclass=file permissive=0
[root@dhcp107-3 ~]#

avc:  denied  { write } for  pid=24487 comm="sshd" name="krb5_0.rcache2" dev="vda3" ino=25190336 scontext=system_u:system_r:sshd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tcontext=system_u:object_r:smbd_tmp_t:s0 tclass=file permissive=0

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
[root@dhcp107-3 ~]# rpm -q ipa-server selinux-policy
ipa-server-4.8.7-2.module+el8.3.0+6996+12d13a13.x86_64
selinux-policy-3.14.3-45.el8.noarch
[root@dhcp107-3 ~]# 


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install IPA Server
2. Install IPA client
3. kinit admin on IPA client
4. ssh -k -l admin <IPA Server>

Actual results:
ssh fails and asks for password

Expected results:
ssh should be successful without asking password and should use krb5 ticket for auth purpose.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Zdenek Pytela 2020-06-19 11:12:49 UTC
Kaleem,

The krb5_0.rcache2 file has smbd_tmp_t type which does not seem to be correct. Do you know how this file was created?

Comment 2 Kaleem 2020-06-19 11:23:29 UTC
(In reply to Zdenek Pytela from comment #1)
> Kaleem,
> 
> The krb5_0.rcache2 file has smbd_tmp_t type which does not seem to be
> correct. Do you know how this file was created?

I think this is needed in case of trust scenario with windows but putting needinfo on Alexander for confirming this.

Comment 3 Alexander Bokovoy 2020-06-22 07:19:51 UTC
I have seen this too. Well, if two daemons running under root use Kerberos, it is libkrb5 they use produces a replay cache in the same location. Who does it first, gets the label.

May be we shouldn't apply the per-app type to this specific file? May be we should make a type that is allowed to both apps?

Comment 4 Zdenek Pytela 2020-06-24 10:28:37 UTC
This bug has not been acknowledged by the subsystem to be resolved during the RHEL 8.3 development and testing phase.
If you believe the decision needs to be reconsidered, please adjust severity accordingly and bring out justification.

Comment 5 Alexander Bokovoy 2020-06-24 11:53:50 UTC
Since this affects all RHEL IdM installations in the default configuration and wasn't a problem in RHEL 8.2, it is pretty much a regression and blocker from RHEL IdM point of view.

We need to have this fixed before the issue gets to produce increase of customer cases.

Comment 20 Zdenek Pytela 2020-07-27 16:15:31 UTC
I've submitted a Fedora PR to address the issue:
https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux-policy-contrib/pull/312

Comment 21 Zdenek Pytela 2020-07-27 16:17:43 UTC
*** Bug 1857253 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 22 Zdenek Pytela 2020-07-27 16:17:51 UTC
*** Bug 1847221 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 33 Sergey Orlov 2020-08-11 17:15:55 UTC
Zdenek, 

The scenario I mentioned in #26 is still failing. I see that smbd creates /var/tmp/krb5_0.rcache2 with type krb5_host_rcache_t but sshd still creates it with type user_tmp_t.

# rpm -q selinux-policy
selinux-policy-3.14.3-51.el8.noarch

Here is my test:
Setup:
=====
hostnamectl set-hostname master.test.ipa
dnf module reset idm -y
dnf module enable -y idm:DL1/dns
dnf install -y ipa-server-dns ipa-server-trust-ad samba-client
systemctl stop firewalld
ipa-server-install -a Secret123 -p Secret123 --setup-dns --auto-forwarders -n test.ipa -U -r TEST.IPA
echo Secret123 | kinit admin
ipa-adtrust-install -a Secret123 --add-sids -U
mkdir /bz1073829
chcon -t samba_share_t /bz1073829
setfacl -m g:admins:rwx /bz1073829
net conf setparm 'share' 'comment' 'Trust test share'
net conf setparm 'share' 'read only' 'no'
net conf setparm 'share' 'path' '/bz1073829'


Test1 (fails):
======
# rm /var/tmp/krb5_0.rcache2  -f
# ssh admin@`hostname` whoami
admin
# ls -lZ  /var/tmp/krb5_0.rcache2
-rw-------. 1 root root system_u:object_r:user_tmp_t:s0 3008 Aug 11 13:02 /var/tmp/krb5_0.rcache2
# smbclient -k //master.test.ipa/share -c dir
lp_load_ex: changing to config backend registry
gse_get_client_auth_token: gss_init_sec_context failed with [Unspecified GSS failure.  Minor code may provide more information: Generic error (see e-text)](2529638972)
gensec_spnego_client_negTokenTarg_step: SPNEGO(gse_krb5) login failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE
session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE

Test2 (pass):
======
# rm /var/tmp/krb5_0.rcache2  -f
# smbclient -k //master.test.ipa/share -c dir
lp_load_ex: changing to config backend registry
  .                                   D        0  Tue Aug 11 12:53:06 2020
  ..                                  D        0  Tue Aug 11 12:53:06 2020

		20960236 blocks of size 1024. 18028512 blocks available
# ls -lZ  /var/tmp/krb5_0.rcache2
-rw-------. 1 root root system_u:object_r:krb5_host_rcache_t:s0 16032 Aug 11 13:05 /var/tmp/krb5_0.rcache2
# ssh admin@`hostname` whoami
admin
# ls -lZ  /var/tmp/krb5_0.rcache2
-rw-------. 1 root root system_u:object_r:krb5_host_rcache_t:s0 16032 Aug 11 13:05 /var/tmp/krb5_0.rcache2


I do not see AVC failures after Test1, but if I disable dontaudit and repeat the test, I see this:

time->Tue Aug 11 13:09:23 2020
type=PROCTITLE msg=audit(1597165763.137:1062): proctitle=2F7573722F7362696E2F736D6264002D2D666F726567726F756E64002D2D6E6F2D70726F636573732D67726F7570
type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1597165763.137:1062): arch=c000003e syscall=257 success=no exit=-13 a0=ffffff9c a1=55fdcbd0d010 a2=20042 a3=180 items=0 ppid=14373 pid=15255 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm="smbd" exe="/usr/sbin/smbd" subj=system_u:system_r:smbd_t:s0 key=(null)
type=AVC msg=audit(1597165763.137:1062): avc:  denied  { write } for  pid=15255 comm="smbd" name="krb5_0.rcache2" dev="vda1" ino=582881 scontext=system_u:system_r:smbd_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:object_r:user_tmp_t:s0 tclass=file permissive=0

Comment 34 Zdenek Pytela 2020-08-11 20:21:44 UTC
If sshd can be the first to create the rcache file, then yes, this permission was missing.
https://github.com/fedora-selinux/selinux-policy/pull/406

Sergey, do we have any test available to run before respin?

Comment 35 Sergey Orlov 2020-08-12 10:15:00 UTC
Zdenek, 
You can use tests from #33, they cover two scenarios - when sshd creates keytab first and when smbd does the same.
I just checked them and they do work on newlly provisione VM without any modifications. Just ignore "Could not chdir to home directory" in output of ssh command.

Comment 48 errata-xmlrpc 2020-11-04 01:56:46 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (selinux-policy bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:4528


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.