Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.
Bug 184921 - update to new version
update to new version
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: convmv (Show other bugs)
All Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nils Philippsen
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2006-03-10 03:57 EST by Patrice Dumas
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2006-03-10 08:36:12 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
patch with update, remove md5sum use and minor changes (1.10 KB, patch)
2006-03-10 03:57 EST, Patrice Dumas
no flags Details | Diff

  None (edit)
Description Patrice Dumas 2006-03-10 03:57:34 EST
Description of problem:
There is a new version available. I attach a patch.

I also made a change, I removed the md5sum of files check, I find it not usefull
as the archive is allready checked, and other minor changes. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Not relevant

Steps to Reproduce:
Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:
Comment 1 Patrice Dumas 2006-03-10 03:57:34 EST
Created attachment 125937 [details]
patch with update, remove md5sum use and minor changes
Comment 2 Nils Philippsen 2006-03-10 08:36:12 EST
convmv-1.09-1 is building, but I didn't remove the MD5 check (as it might catch
upstream packaging errors) as well as I didn't change the defattr() statement
(both mean the same).
Comment 3 Patrice Dumas 2006-03-10 08:49:35 EST
I though the defattr with - in the end was the preferred form, but I cannot find
it in the wiki, I must have been dreaming...

As for the md5sum, I doubt it is usefull, as the md5sum are regenerated by the
upstream. I removed it because it added a buildrequires and I doubt about its
usefullness, but if you are convinced it is usefull, it's indeed your choice to
keep it or not.
Comment 4 Nils Philippsen 2006-03-10 11:45:17 EST
I think as md5sum should be installed on all system (and isn't that big), it
doesn't hurt to leave it an as a measure against upstream botching their package
build process.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.