Bug 184921 – update to new version

Bugzilla will be upgraded to version 5.0. The upgrade date is tentatively scheduled for 2 December 2018, pending final testing and feedback.

Bug 184921 - update to new version

Summary:	update to new version

Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	convmv (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	rawhide
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Nils Philippsen
QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2006-03-10 03:57 EST by Patrice Dumas
Modified:	2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2006-03-10 08:36:12 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
patch with update, remove md5sum use and minor changes (1.10 KB, patch) 2006-03-10 03:57 EST, Patrice Dumas	no flags	Details \| Diff
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Patrice Dumas 2006-03-10 03:57:34 EST

Description of problem:
There is a new version available. I attach a patch.

I also made a change, I removed the md5sum of files check, I find it not usefull
as the archive is allready checked, and other minor changes. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

1.08-3

How reproducible:
Not relevant

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Patrice Dumas 2006-03-10 03:57:34 EST

Created attachment 125937 [details]
patch with update, remove md5sum use and minor changes

Comment 2 Nils Philippsen 2006-03-10 08:36:12 EST

convmv-1.09-1 is building, but I didn't remove the MD5 check (as it might catch
upstream packaging errors) as well as I didn't change the defattr() statement
(both mean the same).

Comment 3 Patrice Dumas 2006-03-10 08:49:35 EST

I though the defattr with - in the end was the preferred form, but I cannot find
it in the wiki, I must have been dreaming...

As for the md5sum, I doubt it is usefull, as the md5sum are regenerated by the
upstream. I removed it because it added a buildrequires and I doubt about its
usefullness, but if you are convinced it is usefull, it's indeed your choice to
keep it or not.

Comment 4 Nils Philippsen 2006-03-10 11:45:17 EST

I think as md5sum should be installed on all system (and isn't that big), it
doesn't hurt to leave it an as a measure against upstream botching their package
build process.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.