RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Description of problem:
Often it is necessary to permit access to all high-ports. Normally one would use unreserved_port_t for that - and in addition ephemeral_port_t where the system makes this distinction. On EL 8 the port 61000 for TCP and UDP is in neighther range anymore (it has been within ephemeral_port_t on EL7).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
3.14.3-41.el8_2.4

How reproducible:
sepolicy network -p 61000

Steps to Reproduce:
1. check with "sepolicy network -p 61000" (only defined for sctp)
2. compare with other ephemeral port "sepolicy network -p 60999"
3. compare with other unreserved port "sepolicy network -p 61001"

Actual results:
Port only in unreserved_port_t for SCTP

Expected results:
Port in eigther ephemeral_port_t (EL7 like) or unreserverd_port_t also for UDP and TCP

Additional info:
-

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1794531 ***