Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because
the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Description of problem:
I am not sure if this is the common way to discuss this here, but we are still trying to get sorces for RHBA-2020:2659 on git.centos.org (systemd). I was told that Red Hat RCM is responsiable for this
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHBA-2020:2659 (systemd-219-73.el7_8.8.src.rpm)
How reproducible:
Always
Actual results:
No sources
Expected results:
Sources are in git.centos.org relevant branch
Additional info:
JFYI, same for RHSA-2020:2379, RHBA-2020:2662, RHBA-2020:2661, RHBA-2020:2682 and quite old RHSA-2020:2250
(In reply to Mikhail Campos from comment #0)
> Description of problem:
>
> I am not sure if this is the common way to discuss this here, but we are
> still trying to get sorces for RHBA-2020:2659 on git.centos.org (systemd). I
> was told that Red Hat RCM is responsiable for this
It is not. I have absolutely no idea how the propagation of srpms from RHEL to CentOS works.