Bug 185228 - rpmlint gives false E: xxx-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib on -devel packages on x86_64
rpmlint gives false E: xxx-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib on -devel package...
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: rpmlint (Show other bugs)
x86_64 Linux
medium Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Ville Skyttä
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2006-03-12 02:49 EST by Hans de Goede
Modified: 2007-11-30 17:11 EST (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: 0.76-1
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2006-04-11 14:24:26 EDT
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Fix (1008 bytes, patch)
2006-03-12 04:39 EST, Ville Skyttä
no flags Details | Diff

  None (edit)
Description Hans de Goede 2006-03-12 02:49:02 EST
Run rpmlint on a -devel rpm which only contains a .so symlink in /usr/lib64 it
will give:
E: xxx-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib

This only happens on x86_64.

[hans@shalem ~]$ rpmlint libFS-devel-1.0.0-2.2.x86_64.rpm 
W: libFS-devel invalid-license MIT/X11
E: libFS-devel obsolete-not-provided XFree86-devel
E: libFS-devel obsolete-not-provided xorg-x11-devel
E: libFS-devel useless-explicit-provides libFS-devel
E: libFS-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib

I no bad example, but this happens with others too.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:
Comment 1 Ville Skyttä 2006-03-12 04:39:46 EST
Created attachment 126005 [details]

I've committed the attached fix to upstream CVS, it will be included in the
next rpmlint package revision.
Comment 2 Ville Skyttä 2006-04-11 14:24:26 EDT
Done in 0.76-1.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.