One or more of the new sources for this package are identical to the old sources. It's likely this package does not use the version macro in its Source URLs. If possible, please update the specfile to include the version macro in the Source URLs

Latest upstream release: 5.0
Current version/release in rawhide: 3.2-9.fc33
URL: https://gitlab.com/warsaw/flufl.lock

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.


Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/19642/

One or more of the new sources for this package are identical to the old sources. It's likely this package does not use the version macro in its Source URLs. If possible, please update the specfile to include the version macro in the Source URLs

Latest upstream release: 5.0.1
Current version/release in rawhide: 3.2-9.fc33
URL: https://gitlab.com/warsaw/flufl.lock

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.


Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/19642/

One or more of the new sources for this package are identical to the old sources. It's likely this package does not use the version macro in its Source URLs. If possible, please update the specfile to include the version macro in the Source URLs

Latest upstream release: 5.0.2
Current version/release in rawhide: 3.2-10.fc33
URL: https://gitlab.com/warsaw/flufl.lock

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.


Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/19642/

One or more of the new sources for this package are identical to the old sources. It's likely this package does not use the version macro in its Source URLs. If possible, please update the specfile to include the version macro in the Source URLs

Latest upstream release: 5.0.3
Current version/release in rawhide: 3.2-10.fc33
URL: https://gitlab.com/warsaw/flufl.lock

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.


Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/19642/

One or more of the new sources for this package are identical to the old sources. It's likely this package does not use the version macro in its Source URLs. If possible, please update the specfile to include the version macro in the Source URLs

Latest upstream release: 5.0.4
Current version/release in rawhide: 3.2-10.fc33
URL: https://gitlab.com/warsaw/flufl.lock

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.


Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/19642/

One or more of the new sources for this package are identical to the old sources. This is most likely caused either by identical source files between releases, for example service files, or the specfile does not use version macro in its source URLs. If this is the second case, then please update the specfile to use version macro in its source URLs.

Created attachment 1743755 [details]
[patch] Update to 5.0.4 (#1852603)

Latest upstream release: 5.0.5
Current version/release in rawhide: 3.2-11.fc34
URL: https://gitlab.com/warsaw/flufl.lock

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.


Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/19642/

One or more of the new sources for this package are identical to the old sources. This is most likely caused either by identical source files between releases, for example service files, or the specfile does not use version macro in its source URLs. If this is the second case, then please update the specfile to use version macro in its source URLs.

Created attachment 1757000 [details]
[patch] Update to 5.0.5 (#1852603)

the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of python-flufl-lock-5.0.5-1.fc32.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=61954272

Latest upstream release: 5.1
Current version/release in rawhide: 3.2-11.fc34
URL: https://gitlab.com/warsaw/flufl.lock

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.


Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/19642/

One or more of the new sources for this package are identical to the old sources. This is most likely caused either by identical source files between releases, for example service files, or the specfile does not use version macro in its source URLs. If this is the second case, then please update the specfile to use version macro in its source URLs.

Created attachment 1788025 [details]
[patch] Update to 5.1 (#1852603)

the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of python-flufl-lock-5.1-1.fc32.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=68975546

Latest upstream release: 6.0
Current version/release in rawhide: 3.2-13.fc35
URL: https://gitlab.com/warsaw/flufl.lock

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.


Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/19642/

One or more of the new sources for this package are identical to the old sources. This is most likely caused either by identical source files between releases, for example service files, or the specfile does not use version macro in its source URLs. If this is the second case, then please update the specfile to use version macro in its source URLs.

Created attachment 1815310 [details]
[patch] Update to 6.0 (#1852603)

the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of python-flufl-lock-6.0-1.fc32.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=74089705

PR for flufl-lock 6.0:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-flufl-lock/pull-request/1

We should probably have the following SIG groups added to the package too?

- infra-sig (admin access) as this is a dependency for Hyperkitty
- python-sig (commit access)
- epel-packagers-sig (collaborator access, epel* branches)

The dependencies look like they will work fine with flufl-lock 6. Changelog:
https://flufllock.readthedocs.io/en/stable/NEWS.html

There are breaking changes in version 4 and 5, but note that 5 is the first to officially support Python 3.9 and 6 is the first to officially support Python 3.10, so we should probably upgrade to 6 at least in Rawhide

```
python-flufl-lock on  flufl6 [?]  
❯ sudo dnf repoquery --enablerepo=fedora-source,rawhide,rawhide-source --whatrequires python3-flufl-lock
Last metadata expiration check: 0:04:44 ago on Tue 14 Dec 2021 01:53:34 PM PST.
mailman3-0:3.3.4-5.fc35.noarch
mailman3-0:3.3.4-5.fc35.src
mailman3-0:3.3.4-5.fc36.noarch
mailman3-0:3.3.4-5.fc36.src
odcs-0:0.3.4-6.fc35.noarch
odcs-0:0.3.4-6.fc35.src
odcs-0:0.3.4-6.fc36.noarch
odcs-0:0.3.4-6.fc36.src
python-cartopy-0:0.20.0-1.fc35.src
python-cartopy-0:0.20.1-2.fc36.src

python-flufl-lock on  flufl6 [?]                                 
❯ sudo dnf repoquery --requires mailman3 | grep flufl-lock        
Last metadata expiration check: 0:07:05 ago on Tue 14 Dec 2021 01:52:19 PM PST.                                                      
python3-flufl-lock >= 3.1    
python3.10dist(flufl-lock) >= 3.1 

python-flufl-lock on  flufl6 [?]                                 
❯ sudo dnf repoquery --enablerepo=rawhide-source --requires odcs | grep flufl                                                        
Last metadata expiration check: 0:06:51 ago on Tue 14 Dec 2021 01:53:13 PM PST.                                                      
python3-flufl-lock   

python-flufl-lock on  flufl6 [?] 
❯ sudo dnf repoquery --enablerepo=rawhide-source --requires python-cartopy | grep flufl
Last metadata expiration check: 0:07:18 ago on Tue 14 Dec 2021 01:53:13 PM PST.
python3dist(flufl-lock)

Latest upstream release: 7.0
Current version/release in rawhide: 3.2-13.fc35
URL: https://gitlab.com/warsaw/flufl.lock

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/19642/

Created attachment 1850207 [details]
Update to 7.0 (#1852603)

the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of python-flufl-lock-7.0-1.fc34.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81121600

https://pagure.io/odcs/issue/576

Updated rawhide to 6.0.  Can't update to 7.0 until https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2107818 is resolved.

Releases retrieved: 7.1
Upstream release that is considered latest: 7.1
Current version/release in rawhide: 6.0-1.fc38
URL: https://gitlab.com/warsaw/flufl.lock

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/19642/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-flufl-lock

Created attachment 1908085 [details]
Update to 7.1 (#1852603)

the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of python-flufl-lock-7.1-1.fc36.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=91332142

Releases retrieved: 7.1.1
Upstream release that is considered latest: 7.1.1
Current version/release in rawhide: 6.0-1.fc38
URL: https://gitlab.com/warsaw/flufl.lock

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/19642/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-flufl-lock

Scratch build failed. Details below:

GenericError: File upload failed: cli-build/1662337689.7176833.YFPXBYGD/python-flufl-lock-7.1.1-1.fc36.src.rpm
Traceback:
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/hotness/use_cases/package_scratch_build_use_case.py", line 56, in build
    result = self.builder.build(request.package, request.opts)
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/hotness/builders/koji.py", line 198, in build
    output["build_id"] = self._scratch_build(session, package.name, srpm)
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/hotness/builders/koji.py", line 451, in _scratch_build
    session.uploadWrapper(source, serverdir)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/koji/__init__.py", line 3073, in uploadWrapper
    self.fastUpload(localfile, path, name, callback, blocksize, overwrite, volume=volume)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/koji/__init__.py", line 3008, in fastUpload
    raise GenericError("File upload failed: %s/%s" % (path, name))

If you think this issue is caused by some bug in the-new-hotness, please report it on the-new-hotness issue tracker: https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/issues

FEDORA-2022-964edad86e has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-964edad86e

FEDORA-2022-964edad86e has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days