Bug 185287 – kchm patch for chmlib

Bug 185287 - kchm patch for chmlib

Summary:	kchm patch for chmlib

Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG

Aliases:	None

Product:	Fedora
Classification:	Fedora
Component:	chmlib (Show other bugs)
Sub Component:
Version:	rawhide
Hardware:	All Linux

Priority	medium Severity medium
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Assigned To:	Peter Lemenkov
QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Docs Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends On:
Blocks:
	Show dependency tree / graph

Reported:	2006-03-13 05:05 EST by Patrice Dumas
Modified:	2008-01-17 17:30 EST (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-01-17 17:30:03 EST
Type:	---
Regression:	---
Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---

Attachments	(Terms of Use)
patch from kchm (31.91 KB, patch) 2006-03-13 05:05 EST, Patrice Dumas	no flags	Details \| Diff
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Groups: None (edit)

Description Patrice Dumas 2006-03-13 05:05:11 EST

Description of problem:
kchm has a patch for libchm, in the internal libchm provided by that package.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Patrice Dumas 2006-03-13 05:05:11 EST

Created attachment 126028 [details]
patch from kchm

Comment 2 Peter Lemenkov 2007-03-02 15:10:10 EST

What does it change?

Looks like it fixes nothing except some portability issues (already resolved?).
So in would be better to push it upstream. 

I don't need personally this patch.

Comment 3 Patrice Dumas 2007-03-02 15:28:05 EST

It was important at some point for me since I wanted to package 
kchm and it was in the internal kchm libchm so I would have pushed
kchm to drop the internal libchm. But I abandoned kchm so that's not 
a big deal. 

Anyway I thought that you could apply that patch to the fedora 
package to verify that it doesn't break anything, and also submit
it upstream. I could do that too if you are not interested in 
giving it upstream.

Comment 4 Patrice Dumas 2008-01-17 17:30:03 EST

Closing, this patch seems to be of dubious use.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.