test: [sig-network] NetworkPolicy [LinuxOnly] NetworkPolicy between server and client [Top Level] [sig-network] NetworkPolicy [LinuxOnly] NetworkPolicy between server and client should enforce policy based on Ports [Feature:NetworkPolicy] is failing frequently in CI, see search results: https://search.svc.ci.openshift.org/?maxAge=168h&context=1&type=bug%2Bjunit&name=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job&search=%5C%5Bsig-network%5C%5D+NetworkPolicy+%5C%5BLinuxOnly%5C%5D+NetworkPolicy+between+server+and+client+%5C%5BTop+Level%5C%5D+%5C%5Bsig-network%5C%5D+NetworkPolicy+%5C%5BLinuxOnly%5C%5D+NetworkPolicy+between+server+and+client+should+enforce+policy+based+on+Ports+%5C%5BFeature%3ANetworkPolicy%5C%5D https://deck-ci.apps.ci.l2s4.p1.openshiftapps.com/view/gcs/origin-ci-test/logs/release-openshift-origin-installer-e2e-aws-4.4/1278048231695060992
*** Bug 1852981 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
test: [sig-network] NetworkPolicy [LinuxOnly] NetworkPolicy between server and client [Top Level] [sig-network] NetworkPolicy [LinuxOnly] NetworkPolicy between server and client should enforce policy to allow traffic only from a different namespace, based on NamespaceSelector [Feature:NetworkPolicy] is failing frequently in CI, see search results: https://search.ci.openshift.org/?maxAge=168h&context=1&type=bug%2Bjunit&name=&maxMatches=5&maxBytes=20971520&groupBy=job&search=%5C%5Bsig-network%5C%5D+NetworkPolicy+%5C%5BLinuxOnly%5C%5D+NetworkPolicy+between+server+and+client+%5C%5BTop+Level%5C%5D+%5C%5Bsig-network%5C%5D+NetworkPolicy+%5C%5BLinuxOnly%5C%5D+NetworkPolicy+between+server+and+client+should+enforce+policy+to+allow+traffic+only+from+a+different+namespace%2C+based+on+NamespaceSelector+%5C%5BFeature%3ANetworkPolicy%5C%5D An earlier bug with this failure was https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1852979, but closed as a duplicate of this one. Adding.
This should probably be considered a dup of bug 1852977, and both of them _may_ be fixed by the fix for bug 1873311
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1852977 ***