Bug 185674 - /etc/mdadm.conf doesn't match /proc/mdstat
Summary: /etc/mdadm.conf doesn't match /proc/mdstat
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4
Classification: Red Hat
Component: anaconda
Version: 4.0
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Joel Andres Granados
QA Contact: Milan Zázrivec
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-03-16 20:11 UTC by Sean Dilda
Modified: 2014-01-21 22:53 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: RHBA-2008-0653
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-07-24 19:05:29 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2008:0653 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE anaconda bug fix and enhancement update 2008-07-23 15:01:42 UTC

Description Sean Dilda 2006-03-16 20:11:48 UTC
On a RHEL4u2 box installed via kickstart (with all disk configs done in
kickstart) the /etc/mdadm.conf file doesn't match the arrays listed in /proc/mdstat.

As an example, here is the partition info from /root/anaconda-ks.cfg:
#clearpart --all
#part raid.100000 --size=2000 --ondisk=sda --asprimary
#part raid.100001 --size=2000 --ondisk=sdb --asprimary
#part raid.100003 --size=1000 --ondisk=sdb
#part raid.100002 --size=1000 --ondisk=sda
#part raid.100005 --size=100 --grow --ondisk=sdb
#part raid.100004 --size=100 --grow --ondisk=sda
#raid pv.100006 --fstype "physical volume (LVM)" --level=RAID1 raid.100004
raid.100005
#raid swap --fstype swap --level=RAID1 raid.100002 raid.100003
#raid /boot --fstype ext3 --level=RAID1 raid.100000 raid.100001
#volgroup VolGroup00 --pesize=32768 pv.100006
#logvol / --fstype ext3 --name=rootvol00 --vgname=VolGroup00 --size=31680



Also:

[root@webhost-01 ~]# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1]
md3 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0]
      2048192 blocks [2/2] [UU]

md1 : active raid1 sdb2[1] sda2[0]
      1020032 blocks [2/2] [UU]

md2 : active raid1 sdb3[1] sda3[0]
      32491392 blocks [2/2] [UU]

unused devices: <none>
[root@webhost-01 ~]# cat /etc/mdadm.conf

# mdadm.conf written out by anaconda
DEVICE partitions
MAILADDR root
ARRAY /dev/md0 super-minor=0
ARRAY /dev/md3 super-minor=3
ARRAY /dev/md1 super-minor=1


You can see that /proc/mdstat lists md1, md2, and md3.  Whereas mdadm.conf lists
md0, md1, and md3.


In checking various machines with RHEL4 installed, I see this problem on most of
them.

Comment 1 Jeremy Katz 2006-03-21 16:21:28 UTC
Can you provide the partitioning snippet of the actual ks.cfg being used instead
of just the anaconda-ks.cfg (which doesn't end up being identical)

Comment 2 Seth Vidal 2006-03-21 16:24:44 UTC
clearpart --all
part raid.21 --size=2000 --ondisk=sda --asprimary
part raid.22 --size=2000 --ondisk=sdb --asprimary
part raid.30 --size=100 --grow --ondisk=sdf
part raid.29 --size=100 --grow --ondisk=sde
part raid.28 --size=100 --grow --ondisk=sdd
part raid.27 --size=100 --grow --ondisk=sdc
part raid.24 --size=100 --grow --ondisk=sdb
part raid.23 --size=100 --grow --ondisk=sda
raid /boot --fstype ext3 --level=RAID1 raid.21 raid.22
raid pv.26 --fstype "physical volume (LVM)" --level=RAID1 raid.23 raid.24
raid pv.31 --fstype "physical volume (LVM)" --level=RAID5 raid.27 raid.28
raid.29 raid.30
volgroup VolGroup00 --pesize=32768 pv.26
volgroup VolGroup01 --pesize=32768 pv.31
logvol swap --fstype swap --name=swap00 --vgname=VolGroup00 --size=2048
logvol / --fstype ext3 --name=root00 --vgname=VolGroup00 --size=30624
logvol /srv --fstype ext3 --name=srv00 --vgname=VolGroup01 --size=209952



Comment 3 Jeremy Katz 2006-03-21 16:56:16 UTC
Hrmm, the code to write out mdadm.conf is actually reading the minor info from
the superblock, so I'm not sure how they could disagree :-/

Comment 4 Seth Vidal 2006-03-21 18:08:55 UTC
this only happens when we reinstall the box multiple times.

could it be that mdadm is preserving the superblock/old info from the partitions
and assembling them that way?


Comment 6 Red Hat Bugzilla 2007-06-12 03:06:52 UTC
requested by Jams Antill

Comment 9 Joel Andres Granados 2008-03-12 15:31:24 UTC
Backported a change I did for rhel5.  Didn't test.  Should be available in
anaconda 10.1.1.82 and after.

Comment 11 Milan Zázrivec 2008-05-16 11:00:54 UTC
Verified in anaconda-10.1.1.89-1 / RHEL4-U7-re20080514.0

Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2008-07-24 19:05:29 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0653.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.