Description of problem: system-config-display suggests vesa, but sis works better. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): xorg-x11-drv-sis-0.8.1.3-1.2 How reproducible: 100% on my hardware... Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install FC-5 2. Run system-config-display 3. Observe that the name of the card is displayed correctly, monitor is detected right too. But driver is "vesa". Actual results: xorg.conf has "Screen" clause with "Driver \"vesa\"" Expected results: Would be better to use "sis" Additional info: Sis is better because - it allows more resolution - it seems faster on 24 bits (vesa is ok on 16 bits depth) - vesa breaks with Xen on this system (Dell SC-430)
Created attachment 126374 [details] lspci -vvv
Need the PCI ID's.. lspci -vvn ;)
Created attachment 126407 [details] lspci -vvn
Fixed in 0.9.1-4.