Makes sense, it seems that this would be needed for ocs to ocs use case more than external cluster with RHCS since the pool name (in the vast majority of deployments) is the default one. Pushing to 4.6
Included as part of this resync https://github.com/openshift/rook/pull/91
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Moderate: Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage 4.6.0 security, bug fix, enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:5605