Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.

This project is now read‑only. Starting Monday, February 2, please use https://ibm-ceph.atlassian.net/ for all bug tracking management.

Bug 1861386

Summary:	Configuration examples extensively use Filestore
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage	Reporter:	Anton Nesterov <anestero>
Component:	Documentation	Assignee:	Ranjini M N <rmandyam>
Documentation sub component:	Object Gateway Guide	QA Contact:	Tejas <tchandra>
Status:	CLOSED EOL	Docs Contact:
Severity:	medium
Priority:	unspecified	CC:	asriram, ddf-bot, kdreyer, mhackett, rmandyam, trchakra, vereddy
Version:	4.0
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	Backlog
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2023-11-27 04:38:25 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Anton Nesterov 2020-07-28 13:31:04 UTC

Description of problem:

Documentation on RHCS4 extensively uses Filestore-based examples.
For instance, the section "Using NVMe with LVM optimally" of the "Object Gateway for Production" guide concentrates solely on Filestore. To an inexperienced in Ceph reader this might even be not obvious. This can lead to creating a cluster with deprecated Filestore backend or issues with ceph-ansible due to variables set inappropriately.

Chapter in question:

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_ceph_storage/4/html-single/object_gateway_for_production_guide/index#using-nvme-with-lvm-optimally

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2020-07-28 13:31:11 UTC

Please specify the severity of this bug. Severity is defined here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity.

Comment 6 Ranjini M N 2021-11-25 10:05:52 UTC

*** Bug 1995401 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 Ranjini M N 2022-05-17 06:12:15 UTC

*** Bug 1845045 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 15 Red Hat Bugzilla 2024-03-27 04:25:02 UTC

The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days