Description of problem: The dashboard is valuable and easy for users to monitor OCS but it was not clear initially that OCS monitoring falls under Persistent Storage and Object Service. Users did not associate the terms “persistent storage” and object service” with OCS. One user commented that “object service was abstract”. UX issue severity level: 2-High (refer below mentioned doc for severity levels) This BZ is being filed based on the Usability study conducted on RHOCS during July 2020. A complete report on this Usability study can be found here: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1w65Rl2ZsTew-TIqgKUaZ9Y-1DmG1Z4Y59sYQjYC_mMM/edit#slide=id.g547716335e_0_260 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info:
we are trying to push a solution for that with the OLM team. currently we decided to keep the dashboards where they are and not move them into the storage area, but we are still discussing that.
Created attachment 1788339 [details] Block and file .
Created attachment 1788423 [details] Object Service
The UI modifications mentioned in comment#4 are reflected in version "ocs-operator.v4.8.0-404.ci". The screenshot for the same has been attached in comment#5 and comment#6 . Thank you Mugdha Soni
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Moderate: OpenShift Container Platform 4.8.2 bug fix and security update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:2438
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 500 days