Spec URL: https://git.remirepo.net/cgit/rpms/php/phpunit/php-phpunit-php-code-coverage9.git/plain/php-phpunit-php-code-coverage9.spec?id=4422360a3c6ca9021d600bc7bb1dd4ea228a514d SRPM URL: https://rpms.remirepo.net/SRPMS/php-phpunit-php-code-coverage9-9.1.3-1.remi.src.rpm Description: Library that provides collection, processing, and rendering functionality for PHP code coverage information. Fedora Account System Username: remi New dependency of PHPUnit 9.3 Reviewed as php-phpunit-php-code-coverage8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1800790 Changes from v8 https://git.remirepo.net/cgit/rpms/php/phpunit/php-phpunit-php-code-coverage9.git/commit/?id=ce3bca428b27e1c55ed85dfc0e3475e735260348
Updated to 9.1.4 Spec URL: https://git.remirepo.net/cgit/rpms/php/phpunit/php-phpunit-php-code-coverage9.git/plain/php-phpunit-php-code-coverage9.spec?id=b522c31112e9bf45a078c00a6b0b50d309488b66 SRPM URL: https://rpms.remirepo.net/SRPMS/php-phpunit-php-code-coverage9-9.1.4-1.remi.src.rpm
Package approved. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License". 221 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/php-phpunit-php-code-coverage9/review-php- phpunit-php-code-coverage9/licensecheck.txt [x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 3 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: php-phpunit-php-code-coverage9-9.1.4-1.fc34.noarch.rpm php-phpunit-php-code-coverage9-9.1.4-1.fc34.src.rpm php-phpunit-php-code-coverage9.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Autoloader -> Auto loader, Auto-loader, Freeloader php-phpunit-php-code-coverage9.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US autoload -> auto load, auto-load, tautology php-phpunit-php-code-coverage9.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/php/SebastianBergmann/CodeCoverage9/Report/Html/Renderer/Template/css/custom.css php-phpunit-php-code-coverage9.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Autoloader -> Auto loader, Auto-loader, Freeloader php-phpunit-php-code-coverage9.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US usr -> use, us, user php-phpunit-php-code-coverage9.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US autoload -> auto load, auto-load, tautology php-phpunit-php-code-coverage9.src:143: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(js-popper) php-phpunit-php-code-coverage9.src: W: invalid-url Source0: php-phpunit-php-code-coverage9-9.1.4-4422fca.tgz 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 7 warnings.
Thanks! SCM requests https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/27930 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/27931 https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/27932
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/php-phpunit-php-code-coverage9
FEDORA-2020-0f1a5c83ab has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-0f1a5c83ab
FEDORA-2020-0f1a5c83ab has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-0f1a5c83ab` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-0f1a5c83ab See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2020-46ea2c06ea has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-46ea2c06ea` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-46ea2c06ea See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
FEDORA-2020-46ea2c06ea has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.