RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 1868982 - backport route-related fixes from nm-1-26 to NetworkManager
Summary: backport route-related fixes from nm-1-26 to NetworkManager
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Classification: Red Hat
Component: NetworkManager
Version: 8.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: 8.0
Assignee: Thomas Haller
QA Contact: Desktop QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-08-14 20:40 UTC by Thomas Haller
Modified: 2020-11-04 01:48 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

Fixed In Version: NetworkManager-1.26.0-6.el8
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-11-04 01:48:00 UTC
Type: Bug
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2020:4499 0 None None None 2020-11-04 01:48:19 UTC

Description Thomas Haller 2020-08-14 20:40:56 UTC
nm-1-26 has two fixes that should be backported to rhel-8.3:

[1] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/-/commit/cf3cff4f12e78615c18fd829b1f32eac4f607c0b
[2] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/NetworkManager/NetworkManager/-/commit/99b362c9443591b2b643aa09980f1a5dd42b1f6b



The problem that [1] fixes is the the following. On D-Bus we expose some IP routes. But for these routes, we don't export the "type" (presumably, they are all of the "unicast" type). Since 1.26, NetworkManager also supports "type local" routes.

The problem is that NM will now also export "type local" routes, but since their type cannot be seen, they look like normal routes. That is wrong.

Eventually we may want to export local routes too, but then we must properly mark their type.

Test: see the routes in `nmcli` output. Note that there are some routes there, that are actually the local types (compare with `ip route`). Patch [1] will remove these routes.


[2] is more subtle. We have a fuzzy understanding what a "default route" is, and in certain (non-clearly defined) situations we take special care of "default routes". Without [2], NetworkManager will also treat /0 routes of "type local" as default route. While all of this is not well defined, it still seems mostly wrong in this context. The fix is simple.

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2020-11-04 01:48:00 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (NetworkManager bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:4499


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.