Spec URL: https://appadeia.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ilopona/ilopona.spec SRPM URL: https://appadeia.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ilopona/ilopona-1.0.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: ilo pona is a simple dictionary application for toki pona. Fedora Account System Username: appadeia
*** The online help->License indicates "The writing in the background of the word definitions is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0." I think this should be mentioned in License: and %license *** Please remove '.' from the end of the Summary: line *** Please use desktop-file-install: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_desktop_files MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. eg something like: BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils ... desktop-file-install \ --dir %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications \ --remove-category Application \ %{name}.desktop ... --add-category/--remove-category as appropriate for ilopona - see 'man desktop-file-install' *** Please validate appdata.xml file https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/AppData: The AppData files MUST correctly validate using appstream-util validate-relax eg. something like this: BuildRequires: libappstream-glib ... %check (or %install) appstream-util validate-relax --nonet %{_metainfodir}/*.appdata.xml ... note the use of %{_metainfodir} (which can also be used in %files) *** Minor bugaboos: optional: $ rpmlint /home/bhepple/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/ilopona-1.0.0-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm ilopona.x86_64: W: description-shorter-than-summary ilopona.x86_64: W: no-documentation ilopona.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary com.github.Appadeia.ilopona
I would suggest 'Education' as an additional category in .desktop BTW - it works fine on Fedora-31.
CC BY-NC-SA is not permitted in Fedora: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Bad_Licenses_3
So we're off to RPMFusion then, Carson. Not to worry, your existing FAS credentials are good to go, the process is very similar to Fedora. Here are some notes: https://rpmfusion.org/Contributors Once approved and the git repo is setup, getting a new package prepared is similar to fedora but there is no bodhi: eg rfpkg clone free/ilopona rfpkg import ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ilopona-1.0.0-2.fc32.src.rpm rfpkg ci -c rfpkg push rfpkg build and branches: rfpkg switch-branch f31 git merge master rfpkg push rfpkg build ... then close bugzilla ... just send me the bugzilla link when you're ready and I'll review it.
Carson here is the author of the application being reviewed here. He probably can change the license of the assets to CC-BY-SA (no NC). Would you please consider changing the license?
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.
A https://www.examsvce.com/CPQ-Specialist-exam.html is in charge of the effective configuration, upkeep, and implementation of CPQ systems inside an organization. Their responsibilities include comprehending the demands of the organization, setting up the CPQ solution to fulfil those objectives, and assisting end users with training and support. They are essential in pinpointing areas for system optimization and ongoing development.
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days