Hide Forgot
Description of problem: 14 out of 16 tempest tests failed on splitstack deployments. see report: https://rhos-ci-jenkins.lab.eng.tlv2.redhat.com/job/DFG-df-splitstack-16.1-virsh-3cont_3comp_3ceph-blacklist-1compute-1control-scaleup/10/testReport/ Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): RHOS-16.1-RHEL-8-20200813.n.0 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. Run https://rhos-ci-jenkins.lab.eng.tlv2.redhat.com/job/DFG-df-splitstack-16.1-virsh-3cont_3comp_3ceph-blacklist-1compute-1control-scaleup/ 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: Sanity tests passed on same non-splitstack job: https://rhos-ci-jenkins.lab.eng.tlv2.redhat.com/view/DFG/view/df/view/rfe/job/DFG-df-rfe-16.1-virsh-3cont_3comp_3ceph-blacklist-1compute-1control-scaleup/3/testReport/
selinux is preventing qemu-kvm from executing. Here's a snippet from compute-0's audit.log: type=AVC msg=audit(1597535175.792:18853): avc: denied { entrypoint } for pid=84947 comm="libvirtd" path="/usr/libexec/qemu-kvm" dev="overlay" ino=310042 scontext=system_u:system_r:svirt_t:s0:c15,c878 tcontext=system_u:object_r:container_file_t:s0:c411,c758 tclass=file permissive=0 The question is - is this the same as BZ1841822, or a new bug? Can you double the version of t-h-t used to deploy the environment, and whether it's earlier or later than openstack-tripleo-heat-templates-10.6.3-0.20200113185561.cf467ea?
(In reply to Artom Lifshitz from comment #3) > selinux is preventing qemu-kvm from executing. Here's a snippet from > compute-0's audit.log: > > type=AVC msg=audit(1597535175.792:18853): avc: denied { entrypoint } for > pid=84947 comm="libvirtd" path="/usr/libexec/qemu-kvm" dev="overlay" > ino=310042 scontext=system_u:system_r:svirt_t:s0:c15,c878 > tcontext=system_u:object_r:container_file_t:s0:c411,c758 tclass=file > permissive=0 > > The question is - is this the same as BZ1841822, or a new bug? Can you > double the version of t-h-t used to deploy the environment, and whether it's > earlier or later than > openstack-tripleo-heat-templates-10.6.3-0.20200113185561.cf467ea? Hi, Jad -- did you get a chance to double-check the above?
(In reply to Kashyap Chamarthy from comment #4) > (In reply to Artom Lifshitz from comment #3) [...] > > The question is - is this the same as BZ1841822, or a new bug? Can you > > double the version of t-h-t used to deploy the environment, and whether it's > > earlier or later than > > openstack-tripleo-heat-templates-10.6.3-0.20200113185561.cf467ea? > > Hi, Jad -- did you get a chance to double-check the above? We're reasonably confident you're hitting a bug that's already fixed (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1841822) For now,I'm closing this bug. If you think this comment is wrong; feel free to re-open it with more evidence.