Bug 186971 - LABEL=<label> is invalid in redhat-config-cluster(-cmd) even though it works in underlying system
Summary: LABEL=<label> is invalid in redhat-config-cluster(-cmd) even though it works ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Cluster Suite
Classification: Retired
Component: redhat-config-cluster
Version: 3
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
urgent
medium
Target Milestone: rc
Assignee: Ryan McCabe
QA Contact: Cluster QE
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-03-27 19:26 UTC by Tarun Reddy
Modified: 2016-04-26 13:54 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-01-04 20:37:54 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Tarun Reddy 2006-03-27 19:26:39 UTC
Description of problem:
While the core components of RHCS support mounting via LABEL,
redhat-config-cluster does not accept these values under Device Special File.

Editing the cluster.xml file to place LABEL entries works. This seems like it is
a simple GUI fix to allow LABEL entries for Device mounts.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
redhat-config-cluster-1.0.8-1

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a filesystem with a label (mkfs.ext3 -L testLabel /dev/sdd
2. open redhat-cluster-config and create a new service.
3. add a device child. Use LABEL=testLabel as the Device Special File. Press OK.
Get error. (put /dev/sdd in for now)
4. Editing cluster.xml by hand to replace /dev/sdd with LABEL=<label> works.
  
Additional info:
redhat-cluster-config-cmd works in the same broken way when attempting to add a
device by LABEL. For example, 
[root@boulder2 root]# redhat-config-cluster-cmd --service=boulder-testmount
--add_device --name="LABEL=/oradata" 
Error: Device Special File "LABEL=/oradata" does not exist

Comment 3 Chris Feist 2009-07-29 17:08:41 UTC
Pulling the 4.8.z flag as this won't be fixed until 4.9 (at the earliest).

Comment 5 RHEL Program Management 2010-01-04 20:37:54 UTC
Development Management has reviewed and declined this request.  You may appeal
this decision by reopening this request.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.